The Lightweight Nakeds Comparo we did last September was such a hoot we decided to do it again on a few more little thumper/screamers. Flying around sunny SoCal’s freeways and mountain roads like little white blood cells fighting pathogens and boredom in your cardiovascular system is what we do best, flitting from Starbucks to Starbucks, letting the lattes fall where they may.

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

The Honda CB300F came out on top of the last small heap, not too surprisingly, so we decided we needed to throw the new, fully faired CBR300R into the ring against the littlest Ninja – a classic Single vs Twin sporting matchup – which also gave us the chance to see how the recently discovered, made-in-Taiwan SYM T2 250i measures up against the best from Japan. The “Symfighter” belonged with the nakeds, really, but ours is not a perfect world. It’s close though. Consider this our sacrifice to help those of you experiencing the “wicked blizzahd” back east we’re hearing about on the interwebs.

The SYM (middle) is really a naked bike while the CBR and Ninja are fully faired, but all three share an excellent, nearly-upright seating position.

The SYM (middle) is really a naked bike while the CBR and Ninja are fully faired, but all three share an excellent, nearly-upright seating position.

SYM Symfighter T2 250i


The SYM T2 we recently reviewed is a nice enough little bike for zipping around down in the flatlands (unless your flatland is a mile high, like Denver or someplace). Everything works like it should – if not always with quite the well-oiled feel of the Honda and Kawasaki. Its fuel-injection mapping isn’t as refined as those bikes’, but on a 250 you’ve got the throttle pretty much WFO most of the time, anyway, so it’s less of an issue. Though two of the bikes here may look sportier than the SYM since they wear full fairings and it does not, all three, in fact, share standard, upright ergonomics that make it easy and fun to be fully in control while maneuvering through the four-wheeled moving obstacle course. At 385 pounds, the SYM weighs almost exactly the same as the Ninja, and 25 pounds more than the Honda. They’re all light, easy-to-handle little bikes.

If all you want is urban transpo, the Symfighter’s got you covered. But it’s our job to leave civilization behind and head up Highway 39 into the San Gabriels. No more macchiato for you. Actually, they make a mean Frito pie up at Crystal Lake Cafe … let’s ride.

You don’t want to eat too heavy a breakfast on the SYM until you’re on top of the mountain. Once the road climbs past the 2000-feet sign, there’s a long straight that makes you painfully aware you’re on a small bike, and the pain is most acute if you’re on the SYM. Its claimed 25 horsepower feels like around 21 or 22 at the rear wheel. The Ninja’s 34 hp – 50% more – waves sayonara to the SYM, whose top speed at altitude is much less than the 93 its speedo says it can generate, eventually, down closer to sea level. When it’s running at freeway speeds, though, especially on rain-grooved ones, the SYM front end feels a bit nervous. A few more mm of trail feels as if it wouldn’t be a bad thing.

In fit/finish terms and features, the Symfighter is really the equal of the Japanese bikes when it’s parked.

In fit/finish terms and features, the Symfighter is really the equal of the Japanese bikes when it’s parked.

We put our new BFF, Thai Long Ly on the SYM for the climb up the mountain: “She seemed solid until the revs started climbing and the bike started wetting itself. Not in a leaky I-need-a-diaper kind of way, but in an oh God, please stop with the throttle thing and let me cruise with the Harley crowd kind of way. In other words, I’ll catch up … I’ll meet you at the top. Disappointing, because as you twist, she goes. As you keep twisting, she goes not. The canyon that opened when the drag race up the mountain ensued was quite grand. And quite immediate. Giving her the beans, she sounded like a Ducati with a collapsed lung being kicked to the ground by Ronaldo.”


We’d like to tell you the Symfighter’s handling makes up for its lack of pep, but it doesn’t. What the Big Four have that companies like SYM seem to lack are really good test riders and tuners who are able to calibrate even inexpensive suspension to work reasonably well. Due to its lack of power and light weight, the SYM’s a lot of fun to ride on swervy roads all the same, but it lacks the final 20-30% of composure of the Honda and the Ninja. Even with its weakish front brake, you can still decel hard enough to get its fork chattering. When you really start riding, the Symfighter’s less precise gearbox, lack of power and un-optimal suspension tune mean it has a hard time keeping up.

SYM Symfighter T2 250i
+ Highs

  • Actually looks pretty cool
  • Least $$$
  • A big step up from Chinese bikes
– Sighs

  • The competition here is a little too tough
  • More show than go
  • The CBR (or CB300F) is not much more money

Honda CBR300R

Crafty eyeball-tricks abound to make this one look like a big CBR, including the plastic chain guard that makes it look like a braced swingarm.

Crafty eyeball-tricks abound to make this one look like a big CBR, including the plastic chain guard that makes it look like a braced swingarm.

The Honda CBR300R is more like it: 26 hp still isn’t much, but the Honda also left the SYM in its dust on the way up Highway 39. The CBR’s also got just as much torque as the Kawasaki at 2900 fewer rpm, which actually makes it a little easier to zot around upon if you’re a rank beginner or a lazy old guy. The fact that the Honda is 25 pounds lighter than the other two bikes doesn’t hurt it, and lets it cling to the Ninja’s tailsection on roads where there are no straights: Completely standard ergonomics that seem to fit everybody very well, typically transparent Honda controls, willing engine (up to a point) and gearbox, balanced suspension, probably the strongest brakes here – the only thing holding the CBR back in sporting use is its lack of horsepower.

Twenty-six horsepower is pretty okay when it’s time to head downhill…

Twenty-six horsepower is pretty okay when it’s time to head downhill…

Not in sporting use, the Honda is even harder to fault. Where you need a big twist of throttle to get the Ninja revved up and moving, it’s easier to dump the little Honda’s clutch at lower rpm and thump on off. Once you get used to the tach needle being 1500 rpm from redline for miles on end, it’s no problem to keep up your usual freeway pace (mine seems to settle around 85 mph no matter what I’m riding/driving), and at that speed the R version sails along even smoother and more relaxatorily than the naked CB300F, thanks to its fairing and windscreen, as well as faultless stability. T. Roderick agrees the little CBR offers the most expansive and comfy cockpit of the trio.

If it’s not quite the equal of the Ninja as a full-on sportbike, it’s a much closer contest when slicing up urban traffic. The Honda squeezes through the skinniest traffic gaps with the greatest of ease, deals with busted-up pavement like a honey badger, and just gets on with it at well over 60 mpg in commuter mode, all the while needing a little less throttle-twisting than the Ninja to get motivating.

Despite being small bikes, they all carry people up to six feet tall in cramp-free comfort.

Despite being small bikes, they all carry people up to six feet tall in cramp-free comfort.

Still, a little more power would be nice. The world according to Thai: “It’s a nice little bike, but I’d like a bit more poop, and the CBR poops out far too quickly for my tastes. She pulls nicely off the line and gets moving in a respectable manner … she just runs out of steam once the fun starts and you find yourself pulling the lever for satisfaction. Sort of like the attractive girl you’ve been flirting all night with at the Christmas party that finally lets you in, only to pass out drunk the moment her head hits the pillow.”

No means no.

Honda CBR300R
+ Highs

  • #1 for urbane assault
  • Feels like it will last longer than you will
  • Defines user friendly
– Sighs

  • How about a 400cc Single for the U.S. market?
  • A bit buzzy to some at freeway velocity
  • Don’t get much chance to take advantage of low gas prices

Winner: Kawasaki Ninja 300


The extra 47cc Kawasaki gave the Ninja two seasons ago, via a longer stroke, may be the best 47cc a moto manufacturer ever spent. Modern EFI no doubt contributed another big portion of the little Twin’s newfound performance, resulting in a diminutive motorcycle that’ll exceed 100 mph with relative ease (not that you ever should!) and pull away from the other two bikes here without breaking a sweat. It also fattened the rest of the powerband all the way from idle on up.

“The fact that the further thou twisteth the throttle, the faster thou goest, puts this bike firmly in front of the others in this comparo. Where the CBR and SYM poop out, the Ninjette keeps pooping. Rich and cream-like,” sayeth Thai Long Ly, who liked just about everything else about the Ninja equally well: “The Ninja was smooth as butter, churning out a velvety delivery at speeds that’d be classified as “reckless driving” under the California penal code. Having a redline north of 14k (actually it turns red at 13k – Ed.) helps the baby Ninja feel the most sporty of the bunch, and the more composed suspension makes this bike a total hoot to whip around any corner at most sane speeds. I’d say it’s worth the extra cash over the others, and this bike gets my highest recommendation for new riders looking to stay in control of their bikes when leaned over as well as composed when splitting traffic on the freeway.”


Tom Roderick concurs: “The Ninja feels most like a full-size bike with an inline-four engine. The Kawi’s parallel-Twin spins up revs quickly, and for a small-displacement motorcycle, delivers a wide powerband that easily outpaces both the SYM and Honda in any kind of acceleration comparison. Another area where the Ninja’s price tag seems deserved is in its suspension. Very supple on the freeway while providing composure in the twisties. Its seat-to-footpeg ratio is tighter than on the Honda, but all its other qualities outweigh that drawback.”

The first Ninja came with a sundial, kids. All three of these little rippers give you a clock, gas gauge, and other little niceties.

The first Ninja came with a sundial, kids. All three of these little rippers give you a clock, gas gauge, and other little niceties.

We all whined that the Ninja’s brakes felt a bit wooden and underpowered; mostly because it generates speed so much more easily than the other two bikes. After getting any of these three bikes’ brakes nice and warm, you’ll pull the lever all the way back onto your ring and pinkie fingers before you’ll lock the front tire. The Ninja suspension can be a bit harsh on sharp bumps, but on smooth twisty pavement, this one lives up to its Ninja heritage, with firm yet supple, balanced damping that lets you get on with riding like a maniac.

When the going gets tough, the two-piston cheapie brake calipers on the Ninja and the Honda get spongy.

When the going gets tough, the two-piston cheapie brake calipers on the Ninja and the Honda get spongy.

I could do with a quicker-opening throttle, personally, because the Ninja likes plenty of revs for best progress. Aside from that, there’s little to complain about except that the Ninja’s the priciest bike here. This is the one you’re going to outgrow the least quickly, though, and if you’re an experienced rider just looking to downsize/simplify, it’s the one bike of these that’s really doable as a daily driver if you routinely travel more than 20 or 30 miles at a time.

 The Ninja was voted most likely to not grow old by all of us, including Thai.

The Ninja was voted most likely to not grow old by all of us, including Thai.

Kawasaki Ninja 300
+ Highs

  • Looks swoopy, rides like a comfy standard
  • 34 hp feels like almost enough
  • A good rider on this David can slay
    many Goliaths
– Sighs

  • Biggest price tag
  • A better front brake would be nice
  • You’ll be tempted to “overimprove” it
    with expensive upgrades

Small Elephants in the Room

The elephants in the room are the new KTM RC390 and the Duke 390, scheduled to be here soon – both big Singles with enough displacement to really challenge the Ninja – and don’t forget the new Yamaha R3, a 320cc Twin aimed squarely at it. We love a good arms escalation!


Sub-300cc Sporty Bike Shootout Scorecard
Category Honda CBR300R Kawasaki Ninja 300 SYM T2 250i
Price 86.4% 76.0% 100%
Weight 100% 93.3% 93.3%
lb/hp 82.5% 100% 64.6%
lb/lb-ft 100% 93.6% 81.8%
Engine 80.0% 91.3% 68.3%
Transmission/Clutch 78.3% 85.8% 64.2%
Handling 80.0% 90.0% 63.3%
Brakes 75.0% 73.3% 70.8%
Suspension 73.3% 83.3% 66.7%
Technologies 75.0% 76.7% 73.3%
Instruments 80.0% 81.7% 78.3%
Ergonomics/Comfort 81.7% 78.3% 63.3%
Quality, Fit & Finish 81.7% 83.3% 78.3%
Cool Factor 77.5% 81.7% 71.7%
Grin Factor 75.0% 81.7% 63.3%
Overall Score 81.0% 84.3% 73.1%
Sub-300cc Sporty Bike Shootout Specs
Honda CBR300R Kawasaki Ninja 300 SYM T2 250i
MSRP $4,399 (ABS: $4,899) $4,999 (ABS: $5,299) $3,799
Engine Type 286cc liquid-cooled single-cylinder four-stroke 296cc Four-stroke, liquid-cooled, parallel-Twin 249cc Four-stroke liquid-cooled Single
Bore and Stroke 76.0 x 63.0 mm 62.0 x 49.0mm N/A
Fuel System PGM-FI 38mm Throttle Body DFI with dual 32mm throttle bodies EFI
Ignition Computer-controlled digital transistorized with electronic advance TCBI with digital advance CDI
Compression Ratio 10.7:1 10.6:1 10.5:1
Valve Train DOHC; 4 valves per cylinder DOHC; 4 valves per cylinder SOHC; 4 valves per cylinder
Emissions EPA, CARB compliant EPA, CARB-compliant EPA & DOT Approved, C.A.R.B. Approved for CA
Horsepower 26.2 @ 8500 rpm 34.0 @ 11,000 rpm approx. 22 @ 7500 rpm
Torque 17.4 @ 6800 rpm 17.5 @ 9700 rpm approx. 15.3 @ 6000 rpm
Transmission 6-speed; multi-plate wet clutch 6-speed, multi-plate wet clutch, positive neutral finder 6-speed, wet disc type
Final Drive Chain Chain Chain
Front Suspension 37mm fork; 4.65 in. travel 37mm hydraulic telescopic fork / 4.7 in Telescopic Fork
Rear Suspension Pro-Link single shock with five positions of spring preload adjustability; 4.07 inches travel Uni-Trak with 5-way adjustable preload / 5.2 in Uni Swing
Front Brake Single 296mm disc; 2-piston calipers, ABS optional Single 290mm petal-type disc with two-piston hydraulic caliper, ABS optional Disc (288mm)
Rear Brake Single 220mm disc; single-piston caliper Single 220mm petal-type disc with two-piston hydraulic caliper, ABS optional Disc (222mm)
Front Tire 110/70-17 110/70-17 110/70 – 17
Rear Tire 140/70-17 140/70-17 140/70-17
Rake/Trail 25.3° / 3.85 in. (98.0mm) 27° / 3.7 in. (94.0mm)
Wheelbase 54.3 in. 55.3 in. 51.9 in.
Seat Height 30.7 in. 30.9 in. 31.0 in.
Curb Weight 360 385 385
Fuel Capacity 3.4 gal. 4.5 gal. 3.7 gal.
Tested Fuel Economy 57 49 63 mpg
Available Colors Black, Red, Pearl White/Red/Blue, Matte Black Metallic/Yellow Lime Green, Pearl Stardust White Midnight Black, Racing White, Intense Yellow
Warranty One year, Transferable, unlimited-mileage limited warranty; extended coverage available with a Honda Protection Plan. One year limited warranty 24 Months Limited Warranty

Free Insurance Quote

Enter your ZIP code below to get a free insurance quote.

Honda Dealer Price Quote

Get price quotes for Honda CBR from local motorcycle dealers.

Honda Communities

Kawasaki Communities

  • DickRuble

    878.3% in quality and finish and SYM still manages to lose the contest.

  • john burns

    Dick! I dunno if we should charge you a subscription for all the entertainment we provide you or hire you to be proofreader?

  • Reid

    I’ll eagerly await the Hero/EBR 250 to see how it’ll stack up against this current crop…oh wait the YZF-R3 and RC390 are going to clean house.

  • GearDrivenCam

    Excellent review. The only other scorecard category I’d add is fuel economy. Usually at least some mention of such is made in these reviews so I was surprised that it was only included in the specifications. In the overall picture – there’s really not much difference in terms of costs – but it’s just another consideration for those whose purchase is centered more around commuting. Also – costs of ownership. The twin cylinder Ninja will likely cost more for general maintenance and service I suspect. With that being said – I’d pick the Ninja without question in this battle. Looking forward to a comparo that includes the Yamaha R3 and RC390.

  • kawatwo

    “Where the CBR and SYM poop out, the Ninjette keeps pooping.” LOL. Got to love John Burns. You also got to love the 300 Ninja. What a great little bike. Can’t wait for some comparos with the KTMs and R3.

    • john burns

      full props to Thai Long Ly our new pal.

  • ‘Mike Smith

    I’m surprised this article was written. The CBR & Ninja have been compared many times in the last year by various magazines. The SYM Symfighter T2 250i never stood a chance in the performance department, and was the wrong bike to include. It would have been better if you just did a CBR & Ninja comparo on wheelies or something. What I’m really looking forward to is the R3 comparo. R3 vs. KTM 390 vs. Ninja 300 would be a good start. I also don’t understand why you guys rarely drag race and post times. Top speed tests would also be great.

  • Craig Hoffman

    The Ninja is 5 grand. At that rate, you might as well spend a few hundred more and get a CB500F.

    • Michael

      I could not agree more. I bought a CB500F a year ago as my first real bike. I had a used Honda rebel to train on for a few months prior to purchasing the CB500F. The CB500F is not a very powerful bike (~45 hp) but it is a full size bike. These 300cc bikes will always stand out as beginner bikes because of their physical size. Whereas the CB500F (a beginner bike) has the physical dimensions of some big bikes. I’m very glad I bought the CB500F instead of a 300cc or 250cc sport bike. I have my sights set on a 600cc class naked or supersport but will try to stay with the CB500F for quite a while.

      • Craig Hoffman

        Sounds like a great choice Michael. The CB may not be a screaming horsepower champ, but it does have a great real world engine with sweet midrange power, it is indeed a “real” motorcycle, and it is a bargain in today’s market. The CB is what the EX/Ninja 500 used to be, but improved. Ironically it comes from Honda and not Kawasaki!

    • Justin

      Keep in mind that a lot of folks buying/looking at a fully-faired beginner/small displacement bike want a fully-faired bike(especially here in the US) which in fairness would be the cbr500r – beginning at $6300.00 plus a $300 destination charge and at that the little ninja looks to be a significantly cheaper and more attainable option.

      Also the cb500f wasn’t designed with north american tastes in mind and it shows.

      • SteveSweetz

        This is a very good point. The Ninja 300 is better compared with the CBR500R, where the price difference is a bit more meaningful.

        The Ninja is also the much better looking of the two in my opinion – and I say that as a person who owns a CBR500R. You also get a slipper clutch on the Kawi, which is pretty awesome to see on a cheap bike (odd to not see that mentioned in this comparo now that I think about it).

  • Michael

    You guys should have broadened this to a “Small-displacement Sportbike Shootout”. That shootout would have included the Suzuki GW250F, Yamaha R3, and KTM RC390. Since you are considering naked too, the Honda CB300F and Suzuki GW250.

  • Colonel Matumbo

    MO ! Great Shootout Guys. Flogging small Cycles is one of lives Little Pleasures. I see the Small bike market growing quickly as new riders and aging boomers flood this market. Fun Times.

  • frankfan42

    “Where the CBR and SYM poop out, the Ninjette keeps pooping” Are you implying that the Ninjette is more “Full of crap?” The supply has to come from somewhere.
    Great comparison test and I so look forward to reviews of the KTM and Yamaha entries. BTW, why not include acceleration tests here as well? Braking distances would be great also. Subjective measurements are fine, to a point….

  • Jack Meoph

    I have a 2012 Ninjette 250r (it was the wife’s, but she surrendered to old age) and when I get around to riding it, it’s a hoot. I have it on CL, but low ballers want to steal it so I just keep it on the trickle charger and take it out when the mood hits. It never disappoints in the fun factor. I’m putting a new set of tires on it this week (the OEM rear finally melted down) and that should increase the SEG factor.

  • kenneth_moore

    These are interesting, but I’m wondering if the rumors of 4 cylinder 250’s coming our way are true. I’d love to have a Honda CB I-4 in the sub-500cc range to park next to the 1100.

  • overloadinco

    How would the old Buell Blast compare, performance-wise, to these three? I figure it has a little less HP but twice the torque. How does that translate to the street?

    I test rode a Suzi TU-250X and was very underwhelmed. I had an old Ninja 500 and found its 45(?) HP to be enough to get it easily to legal speeds. For a bit I had a hybrid Aprilia RS50 frame with a Yamaha 429cc motocross engine in it, figuring the super light weight and good HP would be great, but it was better on paper than in real life.

  • Craig Hoffman

    This looks like fun. Ninja 250 with a 600 Rotax single shoehorned in it 😉


  • Mike Morrill

    Thanks for the comparison. I owned a 300cc Ninja for a year or so and loved it. Sold it when I moved to Europe. Definitely want to see a Ninja vs. KTM vs. R3 shootout. Don’t make us wait too long.