Almost two years to the month, we took our first ride aboard Kawasaki’s new-gen Z1000 ABS (2014 Kawasaki Z1000 ABS – First Ride). We were initially impressed, scoring the Z1K a 93% in its single-bike review. Then came our 2014 Streetfighter Shootouts (2014 Super Naked Street Brawl, 2014 Super Streetfighter Smackdown) where the Z rounded out the bottom. In all fairness, the Z1K was matched against the most exotic of European nakeds boasting more performance and costlier prices. Even then the Z1K nearly stole third-place podium finishes from the Ducati Monster 1200S.

Enter the 2016 Suzuki GSX-S1000 ABS, a Japanese naked powered by an inline-four-cylinder engine that, on paper, looks to be the Kawi’s equal. Like the Z1000 ABS, John Burns awarded the Gixxus 1K a respectable 86.25% in his First Ride review. But it’s always difficult to take the measure of a motorcycle during a one-day press intro, especially when there’s no competing model with which to measure it by. So, let’s shake the leaves from these two trees, rake them up and see which pile is better to jump into.

In recent times we’ve been unable to often say a Suzuki holds a clear price advantage, but that’s certainly not the case here. At $10,499 the GSX-S1000 ABS (with traction control) is $1,500 less than the $11,999 Z1000 ABS.

In recent times we’ve been unable to often say a Suzuki holds a clear price advantage, but that’s certainly not the case here. At $10,499 the GSX-S1000 ABS (with traction control) is $1,500 less than the $11,999 Z1000 ABS.

As noted, both bikes are powered by inline-Fours. A closer look at each engine’s specs reveals a Kawi motor that’s larger capacity, shorter stroke, bigger bore, and with a 1,000 rpm lower redline compared to the Suzi. During our testing John and I were both of the opinion that the Z1K was the more productive low- and mid-range power producer – accelerating harder out of corners and absolutely walloping the Gixxus in top-gear roll-ons. Our seat-of-the-pants impressions were born out when we strapped each bike to the dyno the following week.

“Kawasaki feels like it has a lot more low-rev power, either that or it’s geared quite a bit shorter,” says JB. “A tooth, maybe two tooths, on the GSX-S’s rear sprocket would wake it right up I bet.” From my 2013 First Ride Impression, I reported that compared to the 2013 Z1000, the rush of forward acceleration is made more prominent by virtue of shorter first-through-fifth gear ratios.

The dyno chart makes Kawasaki’s real-world power advantage obvious, as it holds an edge over the Suzuki everywhere up to 8,700 rpm. The top end is where the GSX-S shines, cranking out a considerable 144 ponies at its peak. Both bikes spin about 5,500 rpm at 80 mph.

The dyno chart makes Kawasaki’s real-world power advantage obvious, as it holds an edge over the Suzuki everywhere up to 8,700 rpm. The top end is where the GSX-S shines, cranking out a considerable 144 ponies at its peak. Both bikes spin about 5,500 rpm at 80 mph.

So, more outright power for the Gixxus but more usable power for the Z1K. Almost a wash. Neither bike excelled at smooth power application as both exhibited the kind of lightswitch throttles associated with EFI systems of the past. The Suzuki boasts a type of combined traction control/ride mode technology where setting #2 softens throttle response while delivering maximum horsepower and increasing TC intrusiveness (setting #3 drops power like a rain mode and ups TC), but even in this mode, modulating power was a black or white affair.

Another issue of engine performance is the production of high-frequency vibrations associated with inline-Fours. “People who can’t tolerate engine vibration need to buy a Twin or a Triple, because both of these bikes give off a little four-cylinder vibration; not an objectionable amount from either one, to me, but it’s discernible,” says Burns. The Kawasaki, to me, emits more irritating vibrations than does the Suzuki, enough so that I’ll choose to ride the Gixxus over the Kawi for this reason alone.

The instrument cluster on the Gixxus 1K is cleaner and more informative with a gear-position indicator and without the two-stage tachometer of the Kawasaki. Note the Renthal Fatbar which may help in damping engine vibes, but definitely makes fine-tuning handlebar placement a breeze.

The instrument cluster on the Gixxus 1K is cleaner and more informative with a gear-position indicator and without the two-stage tachometer of the Kawasaki. Note the Renthal Fatbar which may help in damping engine vibes, but definitely makes fine-tuning handlebar placement a breeze.

The seat on the Suzuki is also a little plusher than the more stylized (Z-stitching) seat of the Kawasaki. Outside of this nitpick, though, both bikes seemed to offer equal comfort, with neither John nor I finding something to complain about. “They both let you get plenty of smooth, quiet airflow, and neither one cooks your thigh meat,” says Burns. “In fact, for the kind of riding I do most of the time, they’re both great utilitarian motorcycles.”

Either bike’s ability to handle uneven pavement is tackled by way of a three-way adjustable fork and a two-way adjustable shock. Maybe it’s the gold anodizing of the KYB fork on the Suzuki, we’re not sure, but both Burns and I preferred the suppleness the Suzuki’s suspension afforded. “For everyday normal commuting, I think I like the Suzuki and its more compliant suspension and cushier seat,” says JB. “The Kawasaki feels sprung a bit stiffer, which is no problem on smooth roads, but I remember the GSX-S suspension feeling a bit overwhelmed on bumpy backroads, but it seems that was true of the Z also.”

With all that pipeage hanging off either side of the Z1000 you’d think Kawasaki engineers could have done away with the under-engine exhaust canister, but there it is. This seemingly extra amount of metal certainly contributes to the Kawi’s 23-pound curb weight disadvantage.

With all that pipeage hanging off either side of the Z1000 you’d think Kawasaki engineers could have done away with the under-engine exhaust canister, but there it is. This seemingly extra amount of metal certainly contributes to the Kawi’s 23-pound curb weight disadvantage.

Outside of the Kawasaki’s suspension compliance, and its 23 extra pounds, the green bike is definitely swifter in the twisties than the blue one. Tire size and rake/trail figures being (nearly) identical, chalk it up to the Z1K’s one-inch lesser wheelbase and stronger suspension allowing the Kawi to transition from left to right in quicker fashion than its lighter-weight competitor. That’s not to say the Suzuki is slow to corner, but it takes just the slightest bit more effort to induce a lean than does the Kawi. The tradeoff being a margin more straightline stability for the GSX-S.

Without the convenience of riding these two back-to-back, you’d never know these minor differences in handling characteristics exist. If you’re looking to make a purchase between the two, it’s a simple matter of the Kawi being a little quicker to turn and the Suzuki having a minor amount more stability. If you’ve a preference between the two attributes, that could be the deciding factor in your purchasing decision.

At the track, during our 2014 Streetfighter Smackdown, we experienced ground clearance issues with the Z1K. On the lower speed confines of the street, neither it nor the Suzuki exhibited lean angle restrictions.

At the track, during our 2014 Streetfighter Smackdown, we experienced ground clearance issues with the Z1K. On the lower speed confines of the street, neither it nor the Suzuki exhibited lean angle restrictions.

When it came time to stop the two naked literbikes, we were in store for another surprise. Like the Suzuki’s price advantage, it’s not often we get to say that a non-Brembo brake was the clear favorite. Between the self-branded calipers of the Kawasaki to the Brembo ones on the Suzuki, we both found the Brembos requiring much more pressure at the lever to apply the same amount of stopping power as those on the Kawasaki. Chalk it up to inferior brake pads or air in the lines for Suzuki’s Brembos, or just flat out better stopping performance for the Kawi, after riding the Z1K, stopping the Suzuki took an obvious amount of extra effort.

When it comes to fashion, Burnsie isn’t a fan of the Kawi’s Sugomi styling saying, “The Suzuki’s not nearly so over-styled, in fact I like most of it, including the same blue they use on their MotoGP bikes. Quite tasty.”

When it comes to fashion, Burnsie isn’t a fan of the Kawi’s Sugomi styling saying, “The Suzuki’s not nearly so over-styled, in fact I like most of it, including the same blue they use on their MotoGP bikes. Quite tasty.”

The 2016 Kawasaki Z1000 ABS retains the same $11,999 MSRP as it did since the revamped model’s introduction in 2014. Kudos to Team Green for holding steady instead of issuing the gratuitous annual $100 or $200 price hikes. But in the face of the Gixxus and its MSRP of $10,499, it’s hard to justify spending the extra dough. The Kawasaki exhibits some advantages, but like JB mentioned earlier, it’d be easy to pep up the GSX-S’s drive by adding a tooth or two to the rear sprocket, providing more direct access to that 144 horsepower. You could also upgrade its braking performance with some aftermarket pads, and quicken its transitioning by dropping rear tire size from its stock 190/50-17 to a 190/55 or 180/55-17.

111215-Japanese-Mega-Standards-Kawasaki-Z1000-beauty-

Kawasaki Z1000 ABS
+ Highs

  • Quick in the corners
  • Low- and mid-range power
  • Great brakes
– Sighs

  • Love it or hate it styling
  • Stiff suspension
  • Comparatively pricey

In retrospect, maybe I was a little too generous in my initial first-ride review of the Z1000 while John a little too stingy in scoring the Gixxus in his first-ride review. Now that we’ve put the two together, it was unanimous between us and the ScoreCard that the Suzuki is the clear winner between them. Being the spendthrifts we are, it’s not surprising we see the financial benefits of purchasing the lesser expensive bike and spending the little it’d take in aftermarket upgrades to perfect its imperfections.

111215-Japanese-Mega-Standards-Suzuki-GSX-S1000-beauty-

Suzuki GSX-S1000 ABS
+ Highs

  • $1,500 less than Z1K
  • More Comfort
  • Less Vibes
– Sighs

  • Peakier engine
  • Slightly less agile
  • Lacking initial front brake bite

I’ve had my say. I’ll let Burnsie walk this one out.

“Other than the coming apocalypse, I think they’re both great bikes for the money, but I think the Suzuki is greater because it’s less money. They’re both supremely comfy due to their standard-bike ergos, but for me the Suzuki’s just a bit nicer, it’s instruments a little easier to read. It also makes huge horsepower and weighs two pounds less than the $17k Aprilia Tuono Factory we put on the scales the same day. I could never buy a motorcycle without the looks of the thing being a big consideration, and I like this Suzuki. I won’t voice my opinion of the Z again, except to say it makes me think of some sort of weird sea serpent with a saggy old bosom covered in bass-boat paint.”

111215-Japanese-Mega-Standards-kawasaki-z1000-suzuki-gsx-s1000-water

Japanese Mega Standards Shootout Scorecard
Category Kawasaki Z1000 Suzuki GSX-S1000
Price 87.5% 100%
Weight 95.3% 100%
lb/hp 84.2% 100%
lb/lb-ft 96.8% 100%
Total Objective Scores 91.1% 100%
Engine 85.0% 86.3%
Transmission/Clutch 83.8% 83.8%
Handling 86.3% 85.0%
Brakes 88.8% 82.5%
Suspension 81.3% 86.3%
Technologies 77.5% 83.8%
Instruments 77.5% 85.0%
Ergonomics/Comfort 83.8% 88.8%
Quality, Fit & Finish 85.0% 85.0%
Cool Factor 77.5% 82.5%
Grin Factor 86.3% 85.0%
Roderick’s Subjective Scores 83.1% 84.4%
Burns’ Subjective Scores 83.1% 85.6%
Overall Score 84.7% 88.0%
Japanese Mega Standards Shootout Specifications
Kawasaki Z1000 ABS Suzuki GSX-S1000 ABS
MSRP $11,999 $10,499 ($9,999 non-ABS)
Horsepower 129.6 hp @ 10,400 rpm 144.4 hp @ 11,700 rpm
Torque 77.2 lb-ft @ 7,600 rpm 76.3 lb-ft @ 9,400 rpm
Engine Capacity 1,043cc 999cc
Engine Type Four-stroke, 4-cylinder, DOHC, 16-valve, liquid-cooled Four-stroke, liquid-cooled, DOHC, inline-four
Bore x Stroke 77.0 mm x 56.0mm 73.4mm x 59.0mm
Compression 11.8:1 12.2 : 1
Fuel System EFI EFI
Transmission 6-speed constant mesh 6-speed constant mesh
Clutch Wet, multi-plate Wet, multi-plate
Final Drive O-ring type, sealed drive O-ring type, sealed drive chain
Front Suspension 41mm inverted SFF-BP fork with stepless compression and rebound damping and spring preload adjustability / 4.7 in 43mm KYB fully adjustable telescopic fork, 4.7-in. travel
Rear Suspension Horizontal monoshock with stepless rebound damping, adjustable spring preload / 4.8 in KYB link type single shock with rebound and preload adjustment, 5.1-in. travel
Front Brakes Dual 310mm petal-type rotors with radial-mounted four-piston monobloc calipers and ABS Dual 310mm semi-floating disc, Brembo radial-mount 32mm four-piston caliper
Rear Brakes Single 250mm petal-type rotor with single-piston caliper and ABS Single 220 mm disc, one-piston Nissin caliper
Front Tire 120/70ZR-17 120/70ZR-17
Rear Tire 190/50ZR-17 190/50ZR-17
Seat Height 32.1 in. 31.9 in.
Wheelbase 56.5 in. 57.5 in.
Rake/Trail 24.5 ° / 4.0 in. 25.0°/3.9 in.
Curb Weight 488 lbs 465 lbs
Fuel Capacity 4.5 gal. 4.5 gal.
Electronics ABS ABS, Traction Control
Colors Golden Blazed Green / Metallic Spark Black Metallic Triton Blue
Warranty 12 Month Limited Warranty 12-month, unlimited miles

Free Insurance Quote

Enter your ZIP code below to get a free insurance quote.

Kawasaki Dealer Price Quote

Get price quotes for Kawasaki from local motorcycle dealers.

Kawasaki Communities

Suzuki Communities

  • DickRuble

    Did JB really say “two tooths”? If chicken had teeth they would shred him to pieces..

    • Alexander Pityuk

      It’s good that you don’t have any.

      • Andre Capitao Melo

        Any chicken?

      • DickRuble

        You do have Burns’s subtle sense of repartee… right from the Syberian intellectual permafrost..

  • SteveSweetz

    I know it doesn’t compete with these on power, but as far as Japanese naked bikes and styling is concerned, I think the FZ-09 is so much better looking than either of these – and the Honda CB1000R for that matter.

    • http://motorcycle.com/ Tom Roderick

      Honda was unable to get us a CB1000R, and John Burns will gladly disagree with you about the attractiveness of the FZ-09.

      • Andre Capitao Melo

        the FZ-09 looks like a crashed bike XD

        • dinoSnake

          +1 upvote. I thought i was the only one who felt that way, considering all the fanboi excitement over it.

          Regretfully, to my eye, the FZ-09 wasn’t beaten with an ugly stick. It was beaten with a cheap-azz stick.

  • Vrooom

    It seems strange you both agree that the acceleration is better on the Kawi, but rate the engine higher on the Suzuki.

    • http://motorcycle.com/ Tom Roderick

      We both gave the Gixxus an engine score of 17.25 and the Kawi an engine score of 17.00, out of 20. I can’t speak for John, but I scored the Kawasaki lower because of its engine vibration. If the Kawi engine was smoother, it would have outscored the Suzuki.

  • Randy Darino

    so what is the full throttle acceleration like between the two?who would win a drag race and 0-60?

    • http://motorcycle.com/ Tom Roderick

      Not sure about 0-60, but top-gear roll-ons proved the Kawi to be the quicker of the two. Considering this and Kawi’s engine characteristics it’s a fair bet the Z1K would win a 0-60 drag race.

  • Ted

    I’M CONFUSED. THE ARTICLE SAYS THE KAWI HAS A LONGER STROKE SMALLER BORE, THE STAT SHEET AT THE BOTTOM SAYS JUST THE OPPOSITE. DO THEY HAVE THE BORE/STROKE STATS SWITCHED AT THE BOTTOM, MAYBE?

    • http://motorcycle.com/ Tom Roderick

      No, the stats are correct, just had it wrong in the text. It’s now corrected.

      • Ted

        Thanks Tom. Have to admit it makes more sense the way you said though.

  • Ducati Kid

    Gentleman,

    I’ll spend some of that $1,500 …

    • DickRuble

      Cool, you just recreated a cca mid-90’s Katana

  • Jeff Keene

    The z1000 “speaks to me” more, whatever that means. Well, I suppose it means that I am one of the 2% of people who like the way that it looks.

    But one guy’s opinion hardly matters, it isn’t why I’m posting. I wanted to say thanks for doing this comparison. I’m seeing a lot of publications comparing the gixxus to the top of the line nakeds from Europe. It suffers in those comparisons just like the z1000 does. It just feels like these two bikes are in a fundamentally different market demographic despite the fact that they can be described in the same language as the exotics. This is the exact write up for which I’ve been waiting.

    May we expect a Ninja 1000 vs GSX-S1000F comparison in the future? Not quite apples to apples there since I don’t see the gixxusf having touring aspirations, but I feel like their markets overlap enough to warrant a scientific flogging.

    • Randy Darino

      second that ninja 1000 vs. GSX-S1000F test.

    • Andre Capitao Melo

      Exactly, people are comparing this two bikes to bikes with almost twice the price. Really unfair.

    • icemilkcoffee

      Me too. I love the styling on the z1000. The Gixxus is kind of timid looking y comparison.

  • Kurt Keilhofer

    You have the time and effort to do dyno testing, but not count gear teeth? That’s a major flaw in a comparison.

    • john burns

      you’re right, we should’ve split the cases and counted the internal gear ratios while we were at it. As it turns out, they both turn about 5500 rpm @ 80 mph like Tom says. The Kawi’s fatter midrange made me feel like it might be geared a bit shorter but it’s not.

      • Will

        In top gear @ 70 mph, the Z is doing an indicated 69 mph while the GSX-S is doing 74. I’ve ridden both bikes and this shootout is pretty much spot-on with my impressions.

  • Ser Samsquamsh

    A Suzuki won a comparison? What is it 2005 or something?

  • Y.A.

    Thanks for this comparison. Both of these are real contenders for my next ride. Wish you had roll on and 1/4 mile data on these.

    • BDan75

      Can’t speak for the Suzuki, but if I recall, most tests had the Z1000 at about 2.8 seconds from 60-80, and around 10.3 at 130 in the quarter mile. Cycle World got one from 0-60 in 2.5 seconds. So yeah…not what most people would call slow.

      • Y.A.

        I actually made a spreadsheet from another bike mag’s performance data times. Z1000 was near the top of roll on times. I don’t know if it has weird short gearing or what but all indicators seem to point to it being a real world beast. That’s why I wanted to see the data, to see how the Suzuki compared.

  • talonz51

    I found it weird that the article rated the z higher on low and mid range power, handling and suspension in the twisties, yet jumps to a Suzuki winner right after that….also how does the zoom get 100% in the categories that it wins but the z doesn’t in the categories that it wins? Weird bias again.

    I was in the running to buy either bike this year and went with the allfaired all rounder ninja 1k instead.

    • Born to Ride

      In the Objective portion of the scorecard, which the suzuki wins every category in this comparo, the other bikes in the category are rated by their relative specifications. For instance, if the Kawi had 9/10th the power to weight of the Zook, then the Zook scores 100% and the Kawi 90%.

  • Old MOron

    Were I in the market, I think I would try to demo both bikes. Then I would agonize about whether the Kawi’s handling advantage was enough to get over its looks. Then I’d agonize over the prices. Then I’d get the Gixxus.

  • BDan75

    Four easy ways to improve the Z1000’s looks. 1) Honda CB300F mirrors; 2) Yoshimura or other tail tidy; 3) Exhaust of your choice; 4) Have the headlights on bright when you look at the front end (helps with the “saggy” look, IMO).

    Then just forget about it and enjoy the bike. It’s a blast! I wonder how many actually sell for MSRP…I paid $9,500 for my ’14 as a leftover in October of last year. If you really want that last 20 horsepower on the top end, a full exhaust and a reflash will get you there.

    I’m sure the Suzuki is great too.

  • Giantsfan

    Just not a fan of origami styling. Oh well.

  • Sentinel

    I agree completely with the mention of “irritating” engine vibes getting through “into” the rider from the Z1000. I can’t stand them, and is one of the main reasons that killed my desires for it or the Z1000SX, which was also too vibey for me. Also as for this “Standard” label. I’d expect a “Standard” or UJM” to at least have reasonable passenger accommodation, which od course niter of these bikes do.

  • Ian Parkes

    The Z’s looks are out there but I like their chutzpah. Not a fan of the hangdog/Vadar face myself but it’s miles better than the Suzuki’s – that pointless, slapped on zig- zagginess which they melted because the weren’t convinced, which only draws attention to the fact they didn’t have a clue what they wanted it to look like.

  • Craig Hoffman

    With it’s greater high speed stability and top end power, the GXS sounds like a good high speed sweeper kind of bike. Genuinely pleased to see 144 ponies from the old K5 engine. It seems Suzuki did not smack it completely senseless with the dumb down stick.

    Drop a tooth on the front sprocket, add a Power Commander, Akrapovich full exhaust and some decent brake pads and the new Suzuki is the kind of bike that would likely make me happy!

  • kw

    I was able to demo the z1000 last summer and if they had one in stock I would have taken it. Vibes were noticeable at around 6k but not terrible.

    • ryde4ever

      I demo’d one too. I loved it. But I couldn’t swing the price. I had rode the Yamaha FZ-07 and an FJ-09 the month before. I wasn’t a fan of the 09, but the 07 felt like the little brother to the Z1000. It was lighter but a little less power. And a lot less expensive. There is an FZ-07 in my garage now. Only got an opportunity to put 800 miles on it before the weather got cold.

      • kw

        I know what you mean, I went to a Yamaha demo day as well. I rode the fz09 and the r6. They were very strict and only let us ride 2 bikes a day or I would have tried the 7. I was tempted by the fz09 but there was just something about that z1000 that spoke to me. Everyone talks about that Yamaha triple and it is fun but that Kawi 4 makes a really nice sound when you roll on the throttle.