2015 Yamaha YZ250FX Review

Scott Rousseau
by Scott Rousseau

It might be easy to dismissively refer to the all-new 2015 Yamaha YZ250FX as a YZ250F with a six-speed transmission or a WR250F without lights. Based on the FX’s technical merits, both statements could be considered mostly true, but neither would remotely do justice to Yamaha’s all-new quarter-liter off-road racer.

2015 Yamaha YZ250FX

Editor Score: 92.0%
Engine 19.0/20
Suspension/Handling 14.0/15
Transmission/Clutch 9.0/10
Brakes 8.0/10
Instruments/Controls5.0/5
Ergonomics/Comfort 9.0/10
Appearance/Quality 10.0/10
Desirability 9.0/10
Value 9.0/10
Overall Score92/100

That’s because the YZ250FX does more than merely split the differences between Yamaha’s motocross-class champion YZ and its all-new WR woods machine. The FX is a serious off-road racing weapon that stands on its own merits and delivers an off-road riding experience that neither of its stablemates can – at least not in stock trim.

The reasons are simple enough: For all its versatility, the all-new WR250F’s EPA-mandated ECU and spark arrestor exhaust system simply wouldn’t do for a balls-out, closed-course off-road racer, and the YZ250F’s five-speed transmission comes up one gear short of providing the flexibility required for hardcore GNCC, WORCS and other closed-course cross-country competition. So, rather than force this type of customer to buy one model or the other and then modify it accordingly, Yamaha simply made it easy by producing a third 250cc four-stroke dirtbike that fits their needs. The good news is that the FX is $100 cheaper than the WR, coming in at $7890.

At a cursory glance, one might think that this was just another Yamaha YZ250F, but it isn’t. Yamaha’s all-new YZ250FX is based on the motocross machine but is designed for closed-course off-road racing.

Naturally, the FX’s 249cc DOHC four-stroke Single engine architecture mirrors that of its sisters. That includes Yamaha’s reversed cylinder head, rearward inclined cylinder and rearward exiting exhaust. Yamaha engineers first introduced this design on its YZ450F back in 2010, and used it to win an AMA 250cc National Motocross Championship with factory rider Jeremy Martin in 2014. Its main advantages include a straighter intake shot to the combustion chamber and symmetrical intake and exhaust ports for more consistent cylinder filling.

Mass centralization is also key to the Yamaha’s design, which places the cylinder in a 6.2-degree rearward incline to place the top-end mass and camshaft rotational inertia toward the center of the chassis. Offsetting the cylinder 3.5mm forward of the crankshaft centerline also frees up horsepower by reducing drag; the connecting rod is more vertical at the moment of greatest combustion force, which reduces piston-to-cylinder wall side thrust.

The YZ250F’s fuel-injected, reverse-inclined, DOHC engine features the same 77.0 x 53.6mm bore and stroke as the YZ250F, but its ECU, six-speed transmission and electric starter are intended to give it an edge in off-road racing.

The FX shares the wet-sump oiling system design used on the YZ and WR. Switching from a dry sump does away with an external oil tank and lines and cleans up the exterior of the motor. The FX’s camshaft profiles are the same as well, except that its decompression system is altered slightly to work with the FX’s electric starter. The piston design and 44mm Keihin throttle body are identical to the YZ and WR.

But the FX’s ECU isn’t the same as its siblings. Preliminary testing revealed that the YZ250F’s ECU was too aggressive to deliver the desired engine tractability in the FX, so the FX gets its own ECU, which can be adjusted with Yamaha’s GYT-R power tuner the same way that the YZ’s unit can. That and the fact the FX’s wraparound exhaust system does not feature a spark arrestor means the FX is not legal for off-road riding on public land. Like the YZ, it is a pure racebike. On the other hand, the FX does receive the WR’s engine cases to accommodate a handy electric start system (a kick starter is still fitted as well) and to house its six-speed transmission.

2015 Yamaha WR250F First Ride Review

Yamaha invited us to sample the YZ250FX at Cahuilla Creek Motocross Park in Anza, California, on the same day that we tried out the new WR250F. While both machines are designed for off-road use, they go about their business in an entirely different fashion.

Unencumbered by EPA mandates, the FX’s 44mm Kehin fuel injection is extremely responsive, allowing the rider to make the most of the engine’s aggressive yet smooth character.

Whereas the WR imparts a more electric power character that is attenuated by its EPA-strangled ECU, the FX is unencumbered by such strict emissions requirements, and the difference is obvious at the first hit of the throttle. The FX feels much more YZ-like, with an impressive low-end lunge that transitions seamlessly into a very usable mid-range and continues to pull cleanly all the way to its rev limiter. Throttle response through the FX’s 10-hole fuel-injector is clean and crisp, and it gives the FX that same “I’m bigger than a 250” power feel that we love about the YZ. There’s no need to abuse the clutch to get the 250 into a usable rev range. It’s strong everywhere.

Yamaha’s sharp-shifting six-speed transmission gives the FX more flexibility than the YZ’s could ever have for pure off-road use. The FX’s first and second gears are steeper than the YZ’s ratios for low-speed picking through tight obstacles, while third gear is identical. Fourth and fifth gear are taller, and the additional overdrive sixth gear not found in the YZ’s transmission gives the FX a warp-drive top speed in wide-open terrain. And yet the FX still feels very much like the YZ to us. In fact, while our test day at Cahuilla Creek didn’t include any time on the facility’s first-class motocross track, we are anxious to log some time with the FX on one just to see how similar or different they really are.

Railing berms on the FX is no different than doing the same on the YZ250F. The FX exhibits extremely light and precise steering that rivals the YZ’s even though the FX weighs 18 lbs. more than the motocrosser.

They handle about the same, as the FX’s aluminum bilateral beam chassis and removable subframe are practically identical to the YZ250F’s. Both feature a 27.08-degree rake, 118mm trail and 38.0-inch seat height, but the FX’s electric starter, sixth gear and other items add 18 lbs. to the package, which checks in at a claimed 249 lbs. wet. To make the chassis more compliant over off-road terrain, the FX’s engine mounts are 2mm thinner than the YZ’s 6mm units.

Ace test rider and off-road racer Ryan Abbatoye enjoyed the FX but noted a slightly nervous feel in the steering at extremely high speeds.

The FX’s lighter weight makes for a more responsive-handling motorcycle than the heftier WR. Steering in both low- and high-speed sections is feather light, and the FX is mostly stable, although expert tester Ryan Abbatoye noted that the FX exhibited a slight headshake at all-out desert racing velocity. Its ergonomic layout is narrow and slim, which allows the rider to place his or her weight where needed to maintain traction and momentum. Running the FX through its paces on Cahuilla’s rocky and sandy 4-mile single-track trail sections was a riot. We think that part of the FX’s handling prowess should be credited to its Dunlop AT81 off-road tires, which have a softer sidewall that makes them feel more compliant over rocks and sharp bumps.

The FX’s suspension delivers tremendous control over extreme hits such as sand whoops and rocks, and it is plenty supple when low-speed chop is encountered.

Speaking of bumps, the FX’s suspension settings differ from both the YZ and the WR. It uses the same basic 48mm KYB air/oil separate Speed Sensitive System spring fork up front, and sports the same 4.4 N/mm springs as the WR, but its valving is different than either the motocross or enduro machines. Out back, the FX’s fully adjustable KYB rear shock uses Yamaha’s proprietary Kashima coating to reduce stiction and features a large 50mm piston for better oil control. It is also fitted with the same 56 N/mm rear spring as the YZ-F, but it is valved for aggressive off-road use instead of motocross. The FX’s suspension performance was excellent in the conditions on our test loop. With 12.2 inches and 12.4 inches of front and rear wheel travel respectively, it is not as supple as the WR’s settings, but it does a fine job of keeping the FX composed at higher speeds, and it can handle big hits with relative ease.

We also like the FX’s brakes, which boast Nissin calipers with 250mm front and 245mm rear wave rotor-style discs. The twin-piston front brake delivers plenty of whoa power with a linear feel, and the rear isn’t too sensitive in loose terrain.

While the FX gets the same heavy-duty ignition as the WR in order to power accessory lighting, it does not get any sort of skid plate to protect the its aluminum frame and engine cases from rock damage. It should.

Interestingly, the FX also features the 160-watt generator found in the WR to power headlights and other accessories, and yet it comes with neither a headlight nor the accessory electric fan found on the WR. We can live with that, but the decision not to equip the FX from the factory with a skid plate to protect its lower frame and engine cases from damage is a misstep. The mounts are there if you want to add your own skid plate. And you will.

At the end of the day, Yamaha deserves a lot of credit for introducing the YZ250FX. Doing so reaffirms the Japanese company’s commitment to off-road riders, and we appreciate it. That said, releasing a sub-standard machine in the face of competition from European off-road giants such as KTM and Husqvarna wouldn’t have been too cool. Fortunately, Yamaha had the best 250cc four-stroke platform from which to build it, and it shows. The FX is one awesome off-road machine, and we expect to see a lot of them in the winner’s circle at off-road races across North America in 2015.

Dunlop’s 21-inch front and 18-inch rear AT81 off-road tires are fitted to the FX. They deliver excellent traction and a more forgiving feel than the Geomax MX52’s found on the WR.

2015 Yamaha YZ250FX Specs

MSRP$7890
EngineLiquid-cooled four-stroke single, DOHC four-valve head
Displacement249cc
Bore x stroke77.0 x 53.6mm
HorsepowerN/A
TorqueN/A
Compression ratio13.5:1
Fuel SystemKeihin EFI, 44m throttle body
IgnitionTCI
TransmissionSix-speed
Final driveChain
Frame typeBilateral beam aluminum
Front suspensionInverted KYB fully adj. fork w/Speed Sensitive System; 12.2 in. of travel
Rear suspensionKYB fully adjustable monoshock w/piggyback reservoir, 50mm piston; 12.4 in. of travel
Front brakeNissin two-piston caliper 250mm wave-style disc
Rear brakeNissin single-piston caliper 245mm wave-style disc
Front tireDunlop AT81 90/90-21
Rear tireDunlop AT81 110/100-18
Wheelbase57.7 in.
Rake27°08´
Trail118mm
Seat height38.0 in.
Ground clearance12.8 in.
Wet Weight249 lbs. (claimed)
Fuel capacity2.0 gal.
Color choicesBlue & White
Scott Rousseau
Scott Rousseau

More by Scott Rousseau

Comments
Join the conversation
 1 comment
  • Craig Hoffman Craig Hoffman on Dec 31, 2014

    This looks sweet indeed! No skid plate is no big deal, as we usually replace the stocker with something better anyway.

    Getting one of these and adding a headlight (if needed) seems the way to go. Cool that it comes with the 160W stator which makes adding lights an option. Also cool that it has a non EPA neutered ECU, firmer race ready suspension and a full rip motor.

    I have been thinking I will eventually move on from my 450 enduro and that I will likely wind up on a KTM 300 two stroke. Getting a bit older, very experienced dirt rider and will eventually need something lighter that is not lame. This new Yam is a nice non KTM off road option. It is a pretty tough task to nudge out the KTM 300, which I regard as the gold standard best serious off road bike money can buy, as my next bike of choice though.

    Can I find happiness on a 250 FX? Maybe! The only thing I don't like is the 2 gal fuel capacity. Another .5 there would make all the difference. Perhaps that is OK with this closed course oriented bike, but the WR variant really should have another .5 gallon in the tank.

    A downer about it being a Red Sticker bike in CA I suppose, but I live in CO baby. I could add lights and plate this bad boy. Wheels are turning. Would love to spend a day on my mountain trails on this bike. All in the name of research, you know :)

Next