2015 Star Bolt C-Spec

Editor Score: 81.0%
Engine 16.0/20
Suspension/Handling 11.25/15
Transmission/Clutch 8.5/10
Brakes 7.5/10
Instruments/Controls3.75/5
Ergonomics/Comfort 7.5/10
Appearance/Quality 9.0/10
Desirability 8.5/10
Value 9.0/10
Overall Score81/100

What do you do when you have a two-year-old cruiser platform that has not only sold well since its inception, but also has risen to the top of your brand’s sales? If you’re Star Motorcycles , you look at how this successful platform can be tweaked to be sold alongside the existing models, hopefully securing an even larger slice of the pie. This is exactly what Star has done with the 2015 Bolt C-Spec. With the Bolt, there was really only one direction to go with this new model. Neither a Bolt Tourer nor a Bolt Classic (complete with deeply valence fenders and chrome baubles) fit the Bolt’s stripped-down aesthetic. Instead, Star decided to inject a little more caffeine into its self-described performance bobber. The result is the C-Spec.

2014 Star Motorcycles Bolt Review

A quick glance at the Bolt C-Spec sitting next to a Bolt or its identical sibling (save for the piggyback shock), the R-Spec, should give the viewer a pretty good idea that the C is for Café – as in café racer. Gone is the slightly pulled back handlebar, and in its place are clip-ons mounted below the triple clamp. No, you didn’t read that wrong. This cruiser has clip-ons, and they look pretty bitchin.

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

If you follow the café racer tradition, you can pretty much guess what else Star’s engineers decided to alter on the C-Spec. While they didn’t fit it with rearsets, the pegs were moved 6 in. rearward, 1.25 in. higher, and 0.5 in. wider. The first two will clearly benefit the C-Spec in the ground clearance department, but the half inch wider takes back a little of that gain. When looking at where the pegs are now located on the right side of the engine, the reason for the increase in width becomes apparent: the exhaust headers and the clutch cover are already there.

2014 Star Motorcycles Bolt Preview

To assist in the desired extra lean angle, the ground clearance was upped by making the fork stanchion 9mm longer and the shock shaft 6mm longer. Although the valving and travel of the suspension remains the same as with the R-Spec, the combined changes net a claimed 37° bank angle for the C-Spec compared to the Bolt’s 33°.

clip ons and triple clamp

Clip-ons on a cruiser? Hell yeah! The instruments get located above the slick triple clamp for better visibility in a crouch.

The result is a saddle that is 30.1 in. off the pavement (versus 27.9 in. on the Bolt). Star says the suspension changes garnered a 1.6 in. increase in ride height, so the shape of the saddle must contribute to the 2.2 in. of height gain. Although the seat’s higher altitude may concern shorter riders, the seat is shaped with a narrow front to ease the reach to the pavement. However, the new peg location complicates matters for shorter folks because they are located directly below the seat, forcing the rider to get his/her boots on the ground in front of the pegs. This requirement appears to negate much of the advantage of the narrow seat. Even with my 32-inch inseam, I initially found foot placement awkward but was able to adapt. When talking to a shorter rider about this issue, she also said that the pegs interfered with her ability to easily move the bike around. Fortunately, the pegs fold rearward, keeping them from whacking the back of the calf during a sloppy launch.

foot pegs and exhaust

Compared to the standard Bolt, the the C-Spec’s footpegs are located 6 in. rearward. The pegs are 0.5 in. wider, thanks to the location of the exhaust alongside the engine cases.

The peg placement issues fade as soon as you get underway. Yes, the leg position is sportier, but it isn’t uncomfortable over the course of a day’s ride. Also, the rider’s feet are now rearward enough to allow the use of legs alone – without an assist from pulling on the grips – to absorb bumps by lifting yer butt out of the saddle. The reach to the clip ons is a fairly long one that angles the rider’s upper body aggressively forward in a way that one would expect from a café racer. Taller riders, particularly those long in the torso, will prefer this reach.

Shorter riders revealed a different perspective than mine. Where I found the position to be ideal for leaning in to the highway speed wind blast, one tester said that she didn’t like the upper body position on the freeway, feeling overextended against the wind. All sized riders, however, noted that the position was good for taking control of the bike and muscling it through turns in performance riding situations. The stoplight grand prix of running through the first three gears benefitted from the aggressive lean forward, but I found the constant lean to be a bit of a nuisance in slow, stop-and-go traffic. (This could be a factor of my horrendously advanced age which places me well outside of the hipster market the C-Spec is directed towards. Hey, you kids…)

female rider on Bolt C-Spec

Note how far forward this petite rider has to sit on the C-Spec because of the long-ish reach to the grips.

The long and short of this is that the C-Spec is a niche bike, geared towards a certain personality and body type. (Read young, assertive, and largely male – you know, people who will sacrifice some level of comfort in favor of performance and attitude.) This is what the bike was designed to be: a means of capturing a section of the market not directly served by the standard Bolt.

2014 Star Bolt Vs. 2013 Harley-Davidson 883 Iron

Other than the idiosyncrasies related to the riding position, the C-Spec behaves like the previous Bolts. It carries its 542 lb. (ready to roll) weight low, making it highly maneuverable at low speeds. The steering is responsive, turning in quickly for a bike with a 29° rake. Star changed the tires to Michelin Commander IIs from the previous Bridgestones for a better “sport feel,” but this would be impossible to prove without a head-to-head comparison.

+ Highs

  • More cornering clearance
  • Sportier riding position
  • Same user-friendly personality
– Sighs

  • Awkward reach around pegs to ground
  • Long reach to clip ons for shorter riders
  • Passenger pegs cost extra

The ground clearance is noticeably better than the original Bolt. The C-Spec can be ridden much more aggressively before dragging. Lest you think it could be mistaken for a sportbike, it won’t. Ride it like a sporty cruiser, and you’ll have a blast with the pegs dragging cleanly. Ground clearance, while improved, is still not that of even most standards.

Bolt C-Spec seat and cowl

The C-Spec comes with a pillion that is covered with a cool seat cowl. However, if you want to actually carry a passenger, you’ll need to buy the $100 passenger footpegs. Note the lip on the seat front. Initially, I found it uncomfortable, but it faded from my radar after a few miles to the point of being a non-issue.

Braking is supplied by the same 298mm wave discs (front and rear) as on the standard Bolt, with a two-piston caliper in the front and a single-piston unit out back. Not surprisingly, the braking quality is the same as the Bolt – being more than adequate but falling short of the binders on sportier bikes. An ABS option is still sorely missed. (Someday, all Bolts will have ABS standard like those in the Euro-zone.)

Like the original Bolt and R-Spec, the C-Spec uses the same proven 942cc, 60-degree V-Twin engine that power the V-Star 950 and the 950 Tourer well. As is becoming commonplace on Star engines, the pistons are forged aluminum pieces while the cylinder liners are a ceramic composite material for better cooling and durability. Star also works to reduce frictional losses by including roller rocker arms to open the valves. A 2.3 liter airbox hangs off the right side of the engine and feeds the cylinders via a pair of 35mm side-draft Mikuni throttle bodies and two 31.5mm intake valves per cylinder. Each throttle body gets its own butterfly valve and injector to help the engine character fit its job description. Similarly, the ECU and EFI both help massage the low- and mid-range power delivery that is so important when doing the stoplight shuffle.

Bolt C-Spec beauty

Gotta love those fork gaiters.

The EFI is a closed-loop system which is constantly adjusting fuel mixture based on analysis of the exhaust content to give the best performance in all riding conditions. After the fireworks in the 85mm x 83mm pent-roofed combustion chamber, the spent gasses travel out via a pair of 28mm exhaust valves. Compression ratio is 9.1:1. The rear exhaust header is routed towards the front of the engine to increase the system’s volume and help move the muffler forward on the bike.

Bolt C-Spec shock

With the exception of the shock’s 6mm increase in length, this is the same unit as the piggyback units on the R-Spec. Star’s engineers have done an admirable job with a mere 2.8 in. of travel. Initial compression is relatively supple, and the damping ramps up progressively through the stroke. Despite my best efforts, I was unable to bottom them out.

Since the Bolt was designed for newer and/or urban riders, ease of operation is an important part of the the package. The clutch effort is low and easy to modulate. The straight-cut transmission’s gear dogs provide silky shifting up and down through the gears with only the occasional cruiser transmission clunk. The carbon fiber belt drive is narrow (21mm) to allow for lighter pulleys and decreasing the rotational mass (better performance) and unsprung weight (better handling) of the rear wheel. Star also stresses that this choice also allows owners to fit larger than stock rear tires without clearance issues.

While a single day in the saddle is hardly enough to fully evaluate the Bolt C-Spec, it clearly falls into the same user-friendly category that has made the original Bolt and the R-Spec so popular. The careful changes to the platform should broaden the appeal to riders who are looking to café their sport bobber.

AIMExpo 2014: 2015 Star Bolt C-Spec First Look Video

In terms of factory-built cafe racers, it’s the Triumph Thruxton that leads the way. Going by the numbers, the Bolt C-Spec retails for $8,690; the Thruxton checks in at $9,499. The C-Spec is heavier at 542 lb. versus 507 lb. for the Trumpet, and the Thruxton’s wheelbase is 58.6 in. to the C-Spec’s 61.8 in. Engine-wise, the 865cc Thruxton peaked with 61.7 hp last time we tested it, while the Bolt yielded 48.5 hp. The Star’s extra displacement gives it a torque advantage, twisting out 54.1 lb.-ft. to the Thruxton’s 44.0 lb.-ft. Sounds like the head-to-head will be fun.

Bolt C-Spec action

This is the urban tough-guy image Star wants the C-Spec to portray.

If you can’t wait for us to tell you how these two bikes shake up, Star says its Bolt C-Specs are already on their way to dealers. Select yours in either Envy Green or Liquid silver.

Bolt C-Spec action

The C-Spec performs great here, too.

2015 Star Bolt C-Spec Specs
MSRP $8,690
Engine Type 60° air-cooled V-Twin
Engine Capacity 942cc
Bore x Stroke 85.0 x 83.0mm
Compression 9.1.1:1
Fuel System Dual Mikuni EFI with 35mm throttle bodies
Transmission 5-speed
Final Drive Belt
Frame Steel double cradle frame
Front Suspension 41mm fork, 4.7 inches travel
Rear Suspension Dual piggyback shocks, preload adjustable, 2.8 inches travel
Front Brakes Two-piston caliper, 298mm disc
Rear Brakes Single-piston caliper, 298mm disc
Front Tire 100/90-19M/C 57H
Rear Tire 150/80-16M/C 71H
Seat Height 30.1 inches
Wheelbase 61.8 inches
Wet Weight 542 lbs
Fuel Capacity 3.2 gal

Free Insurance Quote

Enter your ZIP code below to get a free insurance quote.

Star Dealer Price Quote

Get price quotes for Star from local motorcycle dealers.

Star Communities

Yamaha Communities

  • SRMark

    Priced right where the Ducati Scrambler sits. And the tank seam remains. Make it looks like the SR400 and I’ll be right there.

    • Jack Meoph

      I just read that removing the seam on a tank adds serious $$$$$ to the price.

    • ‘Mike Smith

      Fer christ’s sake, can you be any more picky? Why don’t you point out too glossy of paint or some other retarded complaint?

      • SRMark

        I worked with the so-called “retarded” for many years. Thanks for the compliment. If the rest of the world worked so hard to over come so much we’d be in a much better place. Hope you feel all warm and fuzzy now.

      • 12er

        I’m with SRMark, the cheap stamped tanks look just that, like cheap stamped tanks. On a UJM they are fine, on a cruiser, not so much. Granted this is their “budget” bike line but so is the scrambler and no seams yet on those.

    • stude

      Not only does the tank seam look cheezy and cheap, but so do the front frame down tubes that look like an afterthought to get around the exhaust, and the round speedo with a rectangular digital display that looks like a basket smashed anal appendage. Which is it?… modern or traditional?
      Otherwise, Yamaha did a fair job copying the Sportster.

  • Jason

    Even with the bars under the triple clamps they are still at least 6 inches above the seat. Not the typical cafe racer stance and more standard.

    • Tim Sawatzky

      If they aren’t low enough for you, looks to me from the pic’s like you have about 4″ of room to drop those clip on’s down. But it still doesn’t change the fact that they are trying to change a bobber into a cafe racer with clip on’s and rearsets. Nice idea though, but I can’t see buying this over a Thruxton. What I can see is picking one up in about 3 years for way cheaper than a 3 year old Thruxton.

      • Jason

        That was my point. Putting clip-on bars on a cruiser doesn’t turn it into a cafe racer. The seat is too low and the headstock too high.

  • http://mycarnews.net/ My Car News

    MotorBike Fails – Don’t Ride So Close : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnMmkDgMCdU

  • Jack Meoph

    I’d wait in line for the Ducati …… Full Throttle. Although you might be waiting a couple years from what the dealer I talked to was saying. They won’t even get them till May and they’ve almost sold their entire allotment. Get your deposit down ASAP.

  • Campisi

    SR400 C-Spec, please.

  • Craig Hoffman

    More photos of that petite rider please 😉

    • Evans Brasfield

      You’ll have to get your hands on the Star press kit. :-)

      Here’s one more for you.

  • stude

    The C Spec bar and peg configuration kind of reminds me of my HD Street Rod. Took some getting used to after riding with forward controls, but really liked it after a little seat time. I wouldn’t mind test riding one, but probably wouldn’t buy one.

  • liberpolly

    So it’s heavier and has weaker engine than the Triumph – how is it even a competition?