Church of MO: Year 2000 World Supersport Shootout

John Burns
by John Burns
church of mo year 2000 world supersport shootout

And so it goes; only four years after Ashley came down from the mountain with the MO tablets, and had gained some traction with the holy men and the moneychangers in the temple of Motorcycling, and had enough money to hire a real photographer – along comes Minime and Roland to kickstart the me-too movement years ahead of its time and trash the Suzuki. Luckily, the world little noted, nor long remembered what they said here, but it can never forget what they did. Somehow, we survived anyway. This current crisis, too, shall pass, and when it does, may MO have a new birth of freedom, amen.

Year 2000 World Supersport Shootout


Photography by Kevin Wing

Los Angeles, April 12, 2000 — Food is a funny thing. You can line up five chefs, give them all the same ingredients, and you’ll end up with five different dishes. Motorcycles, it turns out, are much the same way.In this year’s World Supersport shootout, three of the five bikes are completely unchanged from 1999, only one model has been revised, and only one model is included that was omitted before. Still, even with so many similarities, we came up with a completely different end result than what we had last year. That’s what you get for having different chefs stir your pot.

church of mo year 2000 world supersport shootout

We’ve gathered together the main contenders for the World Supersport title: four 600cc four-cylinder machines from Japan and one 748cc V-twin from Italy. All bikes compete head-to-head not only in what often turns out to be the most-competitive race of the weekend but also on showroom floors and back roads as more and more consumers opt for agility and light weight over a 130 horsepower motor pushing around a far more portly mass of semi-precious metals.

While Honda’s CBR600F series motorcycles have generally been regarded as the best all-around 600-class machines made, Suzuki’s GSX-R600 has long been the cream of the crop in racing circles. Last year Yamaha followed up its amazing YZF-R1 with the YZF-R6 that did to the 600-class what its big brother did to the liter-bike class. This year Kawasaki completely redesigned its ZX-6R in order to better compete with the rest of the 600 Supersports and, hopefully, secure the title for Team Green.

Where does the Ducati fit into all this madness, then? After all, can a bike that has an additional 150cc on its nearest competitor yet is still down on horsepower be taken seriously? Or is the chassis, which is almost identical to the all-conquering 996, enough to place the Ducati at the head of the class?

We went into this test with the goal of finding which machine is the absolute best all-around 600 Supersport motorcycle made. We took into account not only racetrack prowess, but also street-skills and drag strip times so that no matter what is your preferred domain, we hope to provide you with the info you need to chose the right mount.

church of mo year 2000 world supersport shootout
Just like Clark Kent, MO’s Jeff Rheaume emerges from the dark to the amazement of onlookers.
church of mo year 2000 world supersport shootout
We thought it would be a duel between the Yamaha and Honda. We were wrong.

Fifth Place: Ducati 748

church of mo year 2000 world supersport shootout
Is that Foggy or Minime? We’ll never tell.

Before this shootout even started, the Ducati 748 was a favorite among staff members. Its scrumptious bodywork and superb back road manners made up for a very stiff ride. The Duc’s motor makes only 89.6 horsepower but all of it is readily available anytime you twist the throttle. Such is the nature of a twin.The Ducati was in its element at the racetrack. Roland Sands, the 1998 AMA 250 GP Champion, said that no matter how fast he went on the 748 he felt like there was a whole other level of performance. Most testers agreed and said that no matter how fast they rode, the Ducati still had something left, even if they didn’t. Despite this, the Ducati’s average lap times were over one second per lap slower on average than all other bikes. This might have to do with the way the motor makes its power or the way the chassis prefers high cornering speeds instead of the more squared-off cornering line preferred by bikes with more power. Given enough track time, most riders would be able to alter their riding style and, on a tight track like the Streets of Willow, at least match the lap times of the Japanese fours.

church of mo year 2000 world supersport shootout
Once a rider adapted to the Ducati he was one with the universe.

We expected the Ducati to fail miserably at the drag strip. Its dry and grabby clutch seemed destined to conspire with meager horsepower numbers to make this a walk down the grocery aisle instead of a hell-bent run up the quarter-mile. The Ducati did finish last at the drag strip, posting times that were more than one-half second behind the class-leading Yamaha, but it was the easiest bike to launch and the maligned clutch seemed impervious to even the most ardent abuse.
Fourth Place: Suzuki GSX-R600The Suzuki was a pleasant surprise. After making only 90 horsepower we expected the GSX-R to be slow on the track and at the drag strip. Even after so few changes over the past few years, the Suzuki’s first few laps at the track had riders commenting on how “right” the bike felt. Roland Sands commented how he could “hold it open more than any other bike” in part because of the relatively mild power output, but also because of how stable and balanced the bike felt. Most testers generally spoke of the Suzuki within the context of a race track, noting how easy it was to ride fast.

Unfortunately, the GSX-R took a little trip to the infield infirmary, needing attention after Sands flicked the bike down the track, mid brain-fart, thinking he could do same things on the Suzuki as he does on his 250 GP bike. This wasn’t good news for some testers who wanted more time on the bike, but it spoke volumes about how confident a rider became aboard the Suzuki. It also spoke volumes about Sands as his eyes looked like saucers when he realized we might have to pay for the damage. Roland, the bill is in the mail.

church of mo year 2000 world supersport shootout
Roland, after you tossed the bike, we don’t think anyone wants to come give you a high-five.

On the street, the GSX-R was a fairly decent ride. The ergos are definitely more suited to race tracks and twisty back roads than a trip down the 405 freeway, but the bike offers solid wind protection and a motor that’s smooth. The placement of the controls are well-thought out and everything works fluidly, rarely necessitating a second thought or a change of any sort. Overall the Suzuki GSX-R600 is race-worthy straight out of the box. It’s biggest flaw is that the competition is so intense.
Third Place: Honda CBR-600F4

church of mo year 2000 world supersport shootout
Calvin’s looking pretty sharp these days…

The Honda CBR600F4 won last year’s shootout and looked poised for a repeat performance. As a street bike the F4 is about as good as they come; only the ZX-6R and its superior wind protection and broad power range was preferred. As far as ease of riding goes, everyone agreed that no other bike offered a platform that was as friendly or easy to negotiate as the Honda. Its smooth and powerful motor, comfortable ergonomics and decent wind protection make this one of the easiest to ride Supersport motorcycles. It is easy to feel comfortable quickly on the CBR600F4.On the track the Honda exhibited the same characteristics as it did on the road. Most testers got up to speed quickest on the F4 and it drew comments such as: “If you’re not an expert, this bike is the best choice.” Lap times were typically one second per lap faster than the Ducati.

church of mo year 2000 world supersport shootout
…but he’s still no Roland Sands.

At the drag strip, the CBR was slightly more than three-tenths quicker and two miles per hour faster than the 748. The F4 was relatively easy to launch although its upright seating position made it tough to get our weight up over the front end to help keep the front tire on the ground. The motor pulled strong, making it easier to keep the rear tire from spinning as violently as on some of the other bikes. But, once out of first gear and into second and third, the main complaint was a rev-limiter that seemed to cut in too early. Where most other bikes’ power began to taper off near red line, signaling a shift-point, the Honda’s mill kept pulling harder as the revs increased and we repeatedly found ourselves blowing a perfectly good launch by hitting the rev-limiter and not shifting soon enough.Second Place: Yamaha YZF-R6

church of mo year 2000 world supersport shootout
This is Roland after our lunch buffet at the Indian food restaurant.

Last year, Yamaha’s R6 tied with the F4 for the top spot in our shootout and, like last year, the R6 ruled the track, drawing comments like, “I just didn’t expect that,” when describing the R6’s handling characteristics.Average lap times were in the neighborhood of one second faster per lap than any other bike, regardless of the rider. Both the brakes and the motor are strong while offering the amount of user-friendliness commonly found on less hard-edged motorcycles. The suspension has the same sort of balance that makes the Suzuki such a great track bike, but the R6 ups the ante with better components, more power and lighter weight for a sharper-edged package. While the R6 is designed for the experienced rider, even intermediate riders and novices may also appreciate the Yamaha’s virtues.

church of mo year 2000 world supersport shootout
Here’s Jeff gettin’ down to business. The R6 responds well to talented riders … and riders like Jeff.

The YZF-R6 is an excellent street bike, although the seating position is a bit more racing-oriented than the 6R or F4. Also, both the Kawasaki and the Honda offer better wind protection. The R6’s motor is a awesome in the upper revs, but there is a lack of bottom-end power that makes passing cars a shift-before-you-go proposition. The suspension soaks up the road nastiness better than we’d expect from a bike with such exemplary track manners, and it looks as sexy as any Japanese 600 ever has.At the drag strip we discovered another niche for the R6. While we expected the Kawasaki to rule while the R6 struggled with wheelies, we found that because the R6 had the most top-end power, it could pull out a good E.T. even if the launch was sub-par. The only problem we had

church of mo year 2000 world supersport shootout
The R6 responds well to hacks like Minime, as well.

was the gearshift lever position that caused a few missed shifts during the initial runs. When we simply raised the lever one notch to get a better pull on the linkage, the problem went away.Even the clutch, which we expected to be fragile, lasted far longer than we expected, withstanding repeated full-throttle, clutch-slipping runs down the quarter-mile. It’s nice to see that Yamaha, in their quest for ultimate performance, didn’t sacrifice much if anything in the way of durability to eek out the last 100th of a percent of performance.

First Place: Kawasaki ZX-6R

Kawasakis have often been considered as horsepower bikes that tended to lack refinement. With its total make-over for 2000, the Kawasaki ZX-6R looked poised to trounce all-comers on the track just as it had on our dyno, posting an impressive run of 96 horsepower, tops in the lot above Honda’s F4 (95.5 bhp) and Yamaha’s R6 (93 bhp).

church of mo year 2000 world supersport shootout
The Kawasaki and its rider, gloating in victory. Shameless.

Kawasaki puts a lot of stock in its AMA/ProStar drag racing effort so we expected the ZX-6R to be the king of the drag strip. However, on a hot day in the high desert the clutch wasn’t up to the abuse. With a best run only two-tenths of a second faster than the Suzuki, the Kawasaki fell three-tenths of a second behind the R6, although it posted a trap speed only one mile per hour slower, hinting that if we were able to get a better launch, the 6R may have ruled the strip. When the ZX wasn’t spinning the rear wheel, the clutch slipped so much that the motor over-revved with each shift since the clutch was unable to hold the next gear.On the street the Kawasaki was our clear favorite. The fantastic motor made beautiful sounds and, matched to a smooth transmission, the upright-yet-still-sporty seating position made any sort of roadwork a

church of mo year 2000 world supersport shootout
Nigel doesn’t like to wheelie. The ZX-6R does. Nigel learned to adapt.

pleasure. The seat is soft and, coupled with well-damped suspension and great wind protection, the ride seemed more VFR800-like than a race-track weapon.Once on the track, however, the ZX-6R showed that the changes made to the bike over the past year add up to more than just a higher MSRP. Without any changes to the stock suspension settings the front end felt fine, although the rear end moved around more than we would have liked. Because the bike turned well into the corners, we left the ride-height adjuster alone and increased the compression a few clicks. This helped settle things down, but the bike never quite attained that balanced feel of the 748 or the GSX-R600.

The Kawasaki’s lap times were only a few clicks off of those posted by the R6 even though some testers felt they just couldn’t get the suspension totally dialed in to their likings. The motor made good power off the bottom and that allowed the bike to attain high velocities down the following straight. Mid-corner the bike would touch down occasionally, though no hard parts dragged. In all, the ZX-6R is a tremendous all-around package.


church of mo year 2000 world supersport shootout
Your bike is somewhere in this line-up. All you have to do is decide what’s most important to you.

At the end of it all, the Kawasaki wins by virtue of its all-around package. Much like the Yamaha YZF-1000 that ruled the open class a few years ago, this Kawasaki does everything well and nothing bad. It has excellent street manners, fully adjustable suspension that has potential to improved lap times considerably, and a motor that is without a doubt the best in class. It’s true that any of these bikes here would put a smile on anybody’s face: But nothing here covers as many different types of riding and pleases more riders than the Kawasaki.The Yamaha was a close second because it’s such a kick-ass bike that makes you feel like a hero when you ride it. It’s hard-edged (though not as much as the Ducati) and not bashful about it. A great bike for sure, but it lacks the ZX-6R’s all-around usefulness. The same could be said about the Suzuki, but it’s still toting around a few too many pounds and it needs an infusion of horsepower. That’s OK though, we hear a new GSX-R600 is on the way for next year.

The Honda and the Ducati are exact opposites; most testers wished the Ducati had more of the CBR’s user-friendliness and that the Honda was a bit more focused. We know, we’re a tough bunch to please but when you’re splitting hairs we can’t be bashful, can we? And at the end of it all, we kept coming back to the ZX-6R. Different testers, a few changes and look at what happens to the pecking order in the Magic Kingdom of World Supersport.

Join the conversation
  • Jon Jones Jon Jones on Mar 29, 2020

    Fine times, indeed.

    • See 1 previous
    • Jon Jones Jon Jones on Mar 29, 2020

      Well said, sir.

  • Arrow Arrow on Apr 02, 2020

    I remember this test which I read with great interest back in the day since I had a 2000 red and black ZX-6R myself. I was quite happy that my taste in bikes was also confirmed by MO :-).
    Even though it did not look as good as my previous bike, the 97 ZX-7R, it was much lighter, much more comfortable, much easier to ride and probably nearly as fast. In a misguided and futile attempt to recapture my youth, I started buying my 90s bikes back recently; I already have a 93 KLR 600 and a 97 ZX-7R (same colors of course!) and I've my eyes on the 2000-2002 ZX-6Rs in the market.