Go Back   Motorcycle Forum > Motorcycle.Com General Discussion > Motorcycle General Discussion

Thread Tools
Old 06-26-2007, 03:06 PM   #1

Administrator's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: On My Bike
Posts: 47
Default 1997 Harley-Davidson Dyna Low Rider

Original Article:
<a href="http://www.motorcycle.com//manufacturer/harley-davidson/1997-harleydavidson-dyna-low-rider-13102.html">1997 Harley-Davidson Dyna Low Rider</a>

Please discuss the Motorcycle.com article 1997 Harley-Davidson Dyna Low Rider in our Motorcycle Forums below. Use the reply button to let others know your comments or feedback on the article. Constructive criticism is always appreciated, along with your thoughts and personal opinions on the bikes and products we have tested.
Administrator is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
Motorcycle Forum
Old 07-12-2010, 09:57 PM   #2
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2

This is obviously an old article, but the misstatements in it are floating around the web so here are some facts.
It was the FLT and FXR frames that were the first that were developed by using computer aided design (CAD), not the Dyna-Glide.
The two rubber-mounts of the Dyna frame do not control vibration as well as the three rubber mounts of the FXR at any rpm. Where the mirrors on a Dyna are mostly useless at speed, the FXR's are clear.
The article does correctly state that the early Dyna frame flexed enough to crack inner primary cases, which belies the later statement that the Dyna frame has greater rigidity than the FXR. In fact, it was the flimsiness of the Dyna frame that forced Harley to solidly bolt the engine case to the transmission, thereby using the drivetrain to stabilize the frame.
As for the personal preferences in the article, it says that staffers would rather have the drag bar, which forces the rider into a hunched over racing posture, as opposed to the buckhorn, which allows an upright riding posture and places your hands in the most comfortable and natural position. But then you say you'd rather have forward controls as opposed to the normal mid mounts- Two strangely opposing viewpoints.
mpz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2010, 05:45 AM   #3
Founding Member
Buzglyd's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,904

They drank a lot back then.
Buzglyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2010, 08:30 AM   #4
Founding Member
pushrod's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Baja 'Bama
Posts: 3,642

(I haven't seen this one used in a while...)

Very good use of facts and data!

I loved my '88 FXRS- Low Rider.
You would not understand,
this is not how I am...

I have become -
Comfortably Numb.
pushrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2010, 08:41 AM   #5
Founding Member
The_AirHawk's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Leanin' Tower O' P-P-P-P-POWAAAAAAAAA!!!!
Posts: 11,491

Originally Posted by Buzglyd View Post
They drank a lot back then.
"Back then"?

Parfois, on fait pas semblant
Sometimes, it's not pretend
Oderint Dum Metuant
Let them hate so long as they fear
политики предпочитают безоружных крестьян
Politicians Prefer Unarmed Peasants
Nothing to see here, Citizen. Move along now...
The_AirHawk is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off