Go Back   Motorcycle Forum > Motorcycle.Com General Discussion > Motorcycle News > Old News > Help!

Thread Tools
Old 07-10-2006, 11:12 PM   #1
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 466
Default Re: 1991 Honda Nighthawk 750 Question.

i wish my first nighthawk lasted me six years.
eekadog is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
Motorcycle Forum
Old 07-10-2006, 11:47 PM   #2
Founding Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 33
Default Re: 1991 Honda Nighthawk 750 Question.

Can't help with the VH setup, but lotsa guys with the bike do the baffle mod. Punch out the rivets in each muffler, pull off the outer lip, pull out the silencer, and drill a few extra holes. Guys say it sounds great with modest decibel increase (my 93 was very quiet stock). As for power increase, I doubt it, but I wouldn't plan on huge increases out of this engine. It just wasn't optimized for power at all, unless you wanted to do cams and carbs. That's actually a big reason why I stepped up to a 94 CB1000--more power from the factory, with the look and feel of the NH. It's the NH's bigger brother! Anyway, maybe that's an idea, too.
dmorga1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 02:18 AM   #3
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 77
Default Re: 1991 Honda Nighthawk 750 Question.

Post your question at the yahoo groups cb750

site and you'll get many good responses. I still regret selling my 92 Nighthawk and have had 3 bikes since that haven't been quite as good.

sanchin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 02:30 AM   #4
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 18
Default Re: 1991 Honda Nighthawk 750 Question.

My wife's 92 Nighthawk has the Vance & Hines exhaust. I don't have any way to make a recording of it. But, I can tell you it sounds OK to my ear. Not great, but not silly.

It's not obnoxiously loud, but she wants the bike to be quieter. I've bought a stock exhaust system to put back on the bike. I'm hoping the extra back pressure will help with a little hesitation at around 3 - 4K rpms.

The real improvement to the bike with the V&H exhaust is weight, not sound or engine power. It's probably half the weight of the stock system You also have to remove the centerstand, so you lose that weight too.

The best reason to keep the stock system is because of the centerstand. You'll have to remove it to install the V&H system. On this bike, I don't think the perceived improvements the V&H system will outweigh the loss of the centerstand and its usefulness in maintaining the bike. If you go for the V&H system, I'd be glad to buy your centerstand.

mctaggert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 05:02 AM   #5
The Toad

seruzawa's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: 8501 ft.
Posts: 17,461
Default Re: 1991 Honda Nighthawk 750 Question.

My experience with 4-1 systems is that they seldom ever give any real hp gain. Often 4-1s worsen performance, but most people will not admit it since it's too embarassing to admit one spent $1000+ for a worse running bike. Sometimes a jet kit will give better gain than a 4-1 or maybe in combination with a 4-1. Dynajet sells lots of kits. It's a crapshoot. Try looking for a nighthawk discussion group where there might be people with experience with these mods.

As stated above weight savings is the main benefit. However several hundered $ for a questionable gain is a poor investment.

A quiet bike is less fatiguing and less likely to get a cop's attention. Sometimes cagers will actually thank you for not making your bike obnoxious.
"Make no mistake, Communism lost a big argument - one we know today as the 20th century."
seruzawa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2007, 04:01 AM   #6
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4

What is the question
TaLT is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off