2012 Harley-Davidson Sportster SuperLow vs. Triumph America [Video]
Prestige-brand cruisers that won’t crush your pocketbook
And The Winner Is...
With MSRPs so close in proximity, the Harley and Triumph’s costs become a non-issue. A prospective buyer is then left to decide which motorcycle will better suit specific needs and desires.
I genuinely found riding the SuperLow a gas. Despite occasionally feeling like the SL’s cramped quarters would eventually grow old if I owned it, I still couldn’t deny the care and quality that Harley invested in this model, from its clean, simple styling to the undeniable “American V-Twin” character it possess. It is, after all, the original.
![]() |
But my pragmatic side says the Triumph America just makes more sense for a greater cross section of riders because of its accommodating fit, big bike looks and feel, good overall performance and unique engine. I felt like I could live more comfortably day in and day out with the America than I could the SuperLow. But if you’re a rider that finds the Harley is an ideal fit, then you’ve found your cruiser.
In either case, with such low price tags for these quality motorcycles from venerable motorcycle brands, either choice is the right choice.
| By the Numbers | ||||
| Harley-Davidson Sportster SuperLow | Triumph America | |||
| Engine Type | Air-Cooled V-Twin | Air-cooled parallel-Twin | ||
| Displacement | 883cc | 865cc | ||
| Bore & Stroke | 76.2 x 96.8mm | 90.0 x 68.0mm | ||
| Compression | 8.9:1 | N/A | ||
| HP (BHP or Rear Wheel) | 45.5 | 50.4 | ||
| Torque | 46.3 | 47.1 | ||
| Frame | Steel tube | Steel tube | ||
| Wheelbase | 59.3 in | 63.6 in | ||
| Rake/Trail | 31.1/5.7 | 33.0/5.6 | ||
| Front Suspension | 39mm Showa Fork | 41mm Kayaba | ||
| Rear Suspension | Dual Coil-Over | Dual Coil-Over | ||
| Front/Rear Tires | 120/70 x 18 & 150/60 x 17 | 130/90 x 16 & 170/80 x 15 | ||
| Front Brakes | Single, dual piston | Single, dual piston | ||
| Rear Brakes | Single-piston | Single, dual piston | ||
| Seat Height | 26.8 in. | 27.1 in. | ||
| Wet Weight | 563 lbs | 550 lbs | ||
| Fuel Capacity | 4.5 gal | 5.1 gal | ||
Related Reading
2010 Honda Shadow RS vs. 2012 Harley-Davidson 883 Low
McQueen v. Knievel Road Test
2012 Harley-Davidson Models Updates
2012 Honda Fury vs. 2011 Yamaha Star Stryker
2011 World Cruiser Shootout
2006 Light-Middleweight Cruiser Comparison






















