Go Back   Motorcycle Forum > Motorcycle.Com General Discussion > Motorcycle News > Old News > Triumph News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-09-2002, 01:37 PM   #21
CBR1000F
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 367
Default Re: 2002 Triumph Speed Four Feedback

The likelyhood is that the "retuning" of the engine will not result in ONE extra ft-lb. of torque - it'll just result in the torque peak being moved 500 rpm lower. What it really means is that there will be less hp hit high in the rev range, and the torque hit will be the same but will occurr at a lower rpm. This is only speculation, but that's what apparently ALWAYS happens when they "retune" a sport-model for "standard" duty, and it pisses me off.
__________________
People are more violently opposed to fur than leather, because it\'s safer to harass rich women than bikers.
CBR1000F is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
Motorcycle Forum
Advertisement
Old 01-12-2002, 12:01 AM   #22
CarsSuck
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 282
Default "naked friendly"

"naked friendly" motors don't belong in streetfighters. Not that this is a streetfighter, it's a stock factory bike. But if it's supposed to appeal to streetfighter fans and wannabes, why not have it look as streetfighter as possible? Streetfighters need purposeful looking motors, that's all. Pretty can even be bad in a streetfighter. Save the pretty motors for old people.
CarsSuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2002, 02:54 PM   #23
Steven_Verschoor
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 441
Default Yup!

That's exactly what we need. And throw in the KTM Duke. That way we cover I-4s, V-twins and Thumpers.



Blip, Minime, how 'bout it?
Steven_Verschoor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off