|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#21 |
|
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 367
|
The likelyhood is that the "retuning" of the engine will not result in ONE extra ft-lb. of torque - it'll just result in the torque peak being moved 500 rpm lower. What it really means is that there will be less hp hit high in the rev range, and the torque hit will be the same but will occurr at a lower rpm. This is only speculation, but that's what apparently ALWAYS happens when they "retune" a sport-model for "standard" duty, and it pisses me off.
__________________
People are more violently opposed to fur than leather, because it\'s safer to harass rich women than bikers. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | Remove Advertisements |
|
Motorcycle Forum Advertisement |
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 282
|
"naked friendly" motors don't belong in streetfighters. Not that this is a streetfighter, it's a stock factory bike. But if it's supposed to appeal to streetfighter fans and wannabes, why not have it look as streetfighter as possible? Streetfighters need purposeful looking motors, that's all. Pretty can even be bad in a streetfighter. Save the pretty motors for old people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Registered Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 441
|
That's exactly what we need. And throw in the KTM Duke. That way we cover I-4s, V-twins and Thumpers.
Blip, Minime, how 'bout it?
__________________
http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/tsmileys/d.gif |
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|






