Motorcycle.com

sarnali2 · 03-03-2007, 09:41 AM

If you insist on getting a can, at least get a Triumph Off Road with their download. They give a decent performance gain without being obnoxiously loud. To be honest I havn't ridden one with or without a TOR, but I do have experiance with other Triumphs and TOR's and they are a good compromise twixt stock and neighbors-throwing-rocks-loud..

sarnali2 · 03-03-2007, 10:12 AM

Oh yeah, my bad....First Post, I rock, you suck etc, etc......

Buzglyd · 03-03-2007, 11:04 AM

Does the off road pipe come with knobbies too?

BrowningBAR · 03-03-2007, 11:14 AM

No, go with the paddles! I heard the 675 works great in sand dunes.

WeeBee · 03-03-2007, 12:30 PM

If you're just looking for a little more power, try intake rather than exhaust. A power commander ECU set up with a dyno tune will give you what you want without extra noise (I think the 675 sounds great with stock exhaust). It will also smooth your horsepower and torque curves. Do a dyno run before and after-you will see the difference (they'll give you a printout)!

SeanAlexander · 03-03-2007, 03:37 PM

I've ridden and dyno'd it both ways see our 2006 Middleweight Shootout and I personally liked the stock pipe over the TOR system. I think this is because the TOR system gives the bike a "deeper" tone and the cool thing about a triple is the way it wails and howls. When you make the tone deeper it sounds closer to an inline four, loosing some of its three-six-twelve cylinder wail in the process. Besides, the best noises come from the 675's intake anyway.

-Sean

triumph900 · 03-04-2007, 08:02 AM

If you replace the can on a 675, you should remap the FI.

FWIW - I remapped my Tiger for the TOR can and left the stock can on. Bike runs much better. The remap gets rid of most of the lean popping and surging, and I saved $400 by not buying the can.

earthspirit60 · 03-04-2007, 12:26 PM

If you spend the $600.00 on a good riding class vs. the can, intake, download or combination of the 3, you will be mush faster no matter what bike you ride. It is a lifetime investment vs. a 2-3 year investment.

seruzawa · 03-04-2007, 03:26 PM

Another poor deluded fool who thinks that actual experience carries any weight here.

ofcounsel · 03-04-2007, 05:38 PM

The new Jardine slip-on (actually, its a little more that a slip-on, since it esplaces the down pipe all the way to the header) will get you an additonal 5hp on the stock tune. Likely more if you use a power commander or tune boy and a little dyno work. All other slip-ons available for the 675 that I am aware of will work fine with the stock or TOR tune. Just make sure to avoid the Arrow tune with the slip-on, as that will not work at all.

03-03-2007, 09:41 AM	#1
sarnali2 Aging Cafe` Racer Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Sittin' down by my window, lookin' at the rain. Posts: 8,132	Re: Aftermarket Exhaust on a 675: Better or Worse? If you insist on getting a can, at least get a Triumph Off Road with their download. They give a decent performance gain without being obnoxiously loud. To be honest I havn't ridden one with or without a TOR, but I do have experiance with other Triumphs and TOR's and they are a good compromise twixt stock and neighbors-throwing-rocks-loud.. __________________ "Carpe` Throttelum -Loud Suits Save Lives" "All the BMW riders in the room, I want you to leave. Now. Out. "

03-03-2007, 10:12 AM	#2
sarnali2 Aging Cafe` Racer Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Sittin' down by my window, lookin' at the rain. Posts: 8,132	Re: Aftermarket Exhaust on a 675: Better or Worse? Oh yeah, my bad....First Post, I rock, you suck etc, etc...... __________________ "Carpe` Throttelum -Loud Suits Save Lives" "All the BMW riders in the room, I want you to leave. Now. Out. "

03-03-2007, 11:04 AM	#3
Buzglyd Founding Member Join Date: Nov 2001 Posts: 10,138	Re: Aftermarket Exhaust on a 675: Better or Worse? Does the off road pipe come with knobbies too? __________________ Jay Leno: "President Obama released his tax returns. It turns out he made $900,000 less in 2011 than he did in 2010. You know what that means? Even Obama is doing worse under President Obama."

03-03-2007, 11:14 AM	#4
BrowningBAR Snuggles Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: In a really, really, really old farmhouse Posts: 4,364	Re: Aftermarket Exhaust on a 675: Better or Worse? No, go with the paddles! I heard the 675 works great in sand dunes.

03-03-2007, 12:30 PM	#5
WeeBee Registered Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 24	Re: Aftermarket Exhaust on a 675: Better or Worse? If you're just looking for a little more power, try intake rather than exhaust. A power commander ECU set up with a dyno tune will give you what you want without extra noise (I think the 675 sounds great with stock exhaust). It will also smooth your horsepower and torque curves. Do a dyno run before and after-you will see the difference (they'll give you a printout)!

Sponsored Links	Remove Advertisements
Motorcycle Forum Advertisement

03-03-2007, 03:37 PM	#6
SeanAlexander Founding Member Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Newport Coast, CA Posts: 1,538	Re: Aftermarket Exhaust on a 675: Better or Worse? I've ridden and dyno'd it both ways see our 2006 Middleweight Shootout and I personally liked the stock pipe over the TOR system. I think this is because the TOR system gives the bike a "deeper" tone and the cool thing about a triple is the way it wails and howls. When you make the tone deeper it sounds closer to an inline four, loosing some of its three-six-twelve cylinder wail in the process. Besides, the best noises come from the 675's intake anyway. -Sean __________________ I thought I'd found true happiness in my personal bath body bar.... Then I tried DOVE! with 1/4 moisturizing cream!!!

03-04-2007, 08:02 AM	#7
triumph900 Founding Member Join Date: Nov 2001 Posts: 183	Re: Aftermarket Exhaust on a 675: Better or Worse? If you replace the can on a 675, you should remap the FI. FWIW - I remapped my Tiger for the TOR can and left the stock can on. Bike runs much better. The remap gets rid of most of the lean popping and surging, and I saved $400 by not buying the can.

03-04-2007, 12:26 PM	#8
earthspirit60 Registered Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 88	Re: Aftermarket Exhaust on a 675: Better or Worse? If you spend the $600.00 on a good riding class vs. the can, intake, download or combination of the 3, you will be mush faster no matter what bike you ride. It is a lifetime investment vs. a 2-3 year investment.

03-04-2007, 03:26 PM	#9
seruzawa Robby Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: 8501 ft. Posts: 16,803	Oh jeez. Another poor deluded fool who thinks that actual experience carries any weight here. __________________ I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tanhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in the rain.

03-04-2007, 05:38 PM	#10
ofcounsel Founding Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 1	Re: Aftermarket Exhaust on a 675: Better or Worse? The new Jardine slip-on (actually, its a little more that a slip-on, since it esplaces the down pipe all the way to the header) will get you an additonal 5hp on the stock tune. Likely more if you use a power commander or tune boy and a little dyno work. All other slip-ons available for the 675 that I am aware of will work fine with the stock or TOR tune. Just make sure to avoid the Arrow tune with the slip-on, as that will not work at all.