|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,833
|
I just realized that I really need one of those new Speed Triples. Are those Ohlin forks? VWW
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | Remove Advertisements |
|
Motorcycle Forum Advertisement |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Super Duper Mod Man
![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Anywhere they let me
Posts: 10,484
|
That new Speed Triple is lookin good, and their bike linup for 05 looks impressive. Now all Triumph has to do is drop the Daytona's displacement from 650 to 000, and they will be on track to ditch the only loser in the lineup. The experiment has failed and it's time they forgot about the 600's and concentrate on what they do best.
__________________
I'm a knucklehead |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Robby
![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: 8501 ft.
Posts: 16,803
|
The Speed Triple is even uglier than ever.
I like it.
__________________
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tanhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in the rain. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 409
|
from what rumors I've heard/read, the Daytona will see another bump in capacity in the next year or two. Triumph is supposedly developing a new engine for it, which would be a 750cc triple. If that does come to pass, I can see no argument against it. Who wouldn't want a 750cc triple in a package that handles as well as they Daytona supposedly does. I would say that it doesn't even need to approach full-on Gixxer levels, but I think 120 rwhp should be pretty nice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Robby
![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: 8501 ft.
Posts: 16,803
|
I still believe that 750cc is about the optimum displacement for public roads performance. The GSXR750, in practical terms, is as fast as your gonna be able to go. I doubt that the vast majority of riders who buy the liter-class sportbikes are any faster than they would be on the 750 (or the 600s for that matter). But I guess there's better bragging rights at the Burger Barn with a CBR1000 than a GSXR750.
If Triumph would put some competition back into the 750 class, that would be a good thing. Especially since the Triumphs have a history of better ergonomics in their Daytonas. It seems that the sportbike shootouts always end up with comments by the reviewers that, even though the Gixxers and Yammers and Hondas may be a bit faster, if they had to spend their own money they'd buy a Triumph.
__________________
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tanhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in the rain. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 441
|
Here's another picture of the new Speed Triple... Anybody else see a resemblance to the Buell's aggresive and stubby lines? Or is it more like an English MT03? Whatever it is, I like it!</p>
__________________
http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/tsmileys/d.gif |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,416
|
I don't care for the rear fender on the S3, everything else looks cool though
What I like is putting the 900 engine in the T100, it's like getting a Thruxton with decent ergos !!! |
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|








