|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
12-22-2005, 06:42 AM
|
#1 |
|
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 240
|
Re: Motorcycle pollution ''worse than car pollution'', so say the Swiss.
Wankers! First post?
__________________
Go Hinckley or go Home! |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | Remove Advertisements |
|
Motorcycle Forum Advertisement |
|
|
12-22-2005, 06:53 AM
|
#2 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 31
|
Re: Motorcycle pollution ''worse than car pollution'', so say the Swiss.
what bike did they test to conclude this? was it a harley with straight pipes or my bone-stock 50-mpg-sprint st?
"bollocks" i say |
|
|
|
|
12-22-2005, 07:06 AM
|
#3 |
|
Founding Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Nash Vegas, Tennessee
Posts: 446
|
Re: Motorcycle pollution ''worse than car pollution'', so say the Swiss.
third post, wahoo!
This, of course, fails to take into account the other social benefits of biking. To wit: radically less wear on the road infrastructure, releaved parking pressure, less congestion in traffic, and far less actual fuel used.
__________________
Headlight Fluid?! How dumb does he think I am? When I get back to base with that Elbow Grease, I'm gonna have a talk with the Sarge. |
|
|
|
|
12-22-2005, 07:49 AM
|
#4 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 202
|
Re: Motorcycle pollution ''worse than car pollution'', so say the Swiss.
I know for a fact that this information is not accurate across the board. My injected Ninja was tuned on the dyno with a gas analizer and it's emmisions are less than my car. maybe if they tested a 2 stroke or a P.O.S. in need of rings and some carb work, but not the current stuff. I suppose if they tested a Harley with an after market cam with lots of overlap it would be easy to get bad results, but between the EFI, cat converters and the extreemely lean conditions manufacturers set these bikes to - I don't buy this crap!
|
|
|
|
|
12-22-2005, 07:57 AM
|
#5 |
|
Founding Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,875
|
Re: Motorcycle pollution ''worse than car pollution'', so say the Swiss.
Hmmm. Not a lot of information here. If they are comparing a hybrid Civic to an old RD350, then there might be a problem.
As I understand it, motorcycles can be seen as higher polluting vehicles if the measurement is taken as say, "Grams of pollutant per passenger/horsepower-mile" or something like that. I am sure wiser heads here will know.
__________________
Mongo just pawn in game of life. |
|
|
|
|
12-22-2005, 07:57 AM
|
#6 |
|
Founding Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,875
|
Re: Motorcycle pollution ''worse than car pollution'', so say the Swiss.
Oh, and Yes, the EPA already knows.
__________________
Mongo just pawn in game of life. |
|
|
|
|
12-22-2005, 08:04 AM
|
#7 |
|
Founding Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Delmarva Peninsula
Posts: 2,331
|
Re: Motorcycle pollution ''worse than car pollution'', so say the Swiss.
Consider the source. Look very carefully at the fine print at the bottom. It reads, "Content provided by: Verdict On Cars." Now, check out the website. 'Nuff said.
__________________
"Aid to the helpless indigent is civilized. Aid to the irresponsible is socially corrosive." ----- Schizuki (c. 2011) |
|
|
|
|
12-22-2005, 08:13 AM
|
#8 |
|
Super Duper Mod Man
  
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Anywhere they let me
Posts: 10,479
|
Re: Motorcycle pollution ''worse than car pollution'', so say the Swiss.
And here I thought they only wanted to ban motorcycles because they were loud and obnoxious. I guess this story shoots that theory in the ass.
__________________
I'm a knucklehead |
|
|
|
|
12-22-2005, 08:42 AM
|
#9 |
|
Founding Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
Posts: 265
|
Re: Motorcycle pollution ''worse than car pollution'', so say the Swiss.
Looks like I'd better not let them test my 1973 Kawasaki Mach III 2-stroke triple.
|
|
|
|
|
12-22-2005, 09:17 AM
|
#10 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rock throwing distance from Home Despot HQ
Posts: 1,140
|
Re: Motorcycle pollution ''worse than car pollution'', so say the Swiss.
Reuters ain't exactly the most reliable news source on this planet. See James Taranto's "Best of the Web" daily feature in WSJ's online Opinion Journal...especially the "Not too Brite" feature...on all things going on in "Reutersville".
Anywho, on Drudge early today was a link to a Brit proposal to monitor ALL traffic 24/7 with data kept 2 yr minimum on movements of ALL vehicles on ALL roads at ALL times. Hello Big Brother traffic cameras. The Euroweenies -and I'm sad to include the mother country in this group of losers - can and will regulate anything. This stuff is not only no suprise but sadly expected. Sounds like Longride is in dire need of a "Thunder in the Whatever" fix. Earplugs optional, of course! |
|
|
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
