Go Back   Motorcycle Forum > Motorcycle.Com General Discussion > Motorcycle News > Old News > Paranoid News Clips

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-22-2003, 01:53 PM   #31
captainwhoopass
Founding Member
 
captainwhoopass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,670
Default Re: 100 Lawmakers Support End Biker Health Insurance Bias

To say that the Constitution DOESN'T change with society is insane. How do you explain amendments 11 through 27?
__________________
<blockquote>
\"I knew it. I\'m surrounded by a$$holes.\" [b][i]Lord Helmet, Spaceballs
captainwhoopass is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
Motorcycle Forum
Advertisement
Old 07-22-2003, 02:17 PM   #32
James_Brown
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 171
Default Re: 100 Lawmakers Support End Biker Health Insurance Bias

Damn, people have been getting off since I last checked.

I should know better than to get dragged in to this crap, but once more into the...



Your interpretation of the constitution is like your mind, hopelessly narrow. The founding fathers did not intend to construct a complete laundry list. To suggest they did is baseless. The Constitution was drafted to be mutable within the systems defined (exec,leg,jud)and there are cues to that throughout the constitution and throughout the writings of its authors, especially the federalists.

You find a narrow reading of listed powers compelling in regards to the scope of legislative authority, but ignore it as it relates to the limits on legislative authority and provide no reasoning for doing so. The fact that there are two lists (scope and limits)indicates that the founding fathers saw room for interpretation and change. If they did not foresee this dynamic, then one list would have sufficed. The founding fathers could have just listed those powers expressly allowed and been done with it. Your argument would make some sense in that scenario. However, that is not the way they chose to go and they did so for good reason.



Your argument has been lost twice. Once at the Constitutional Convention and again with the Civil War. Maybe you can start a new confederacy in Cuba after Castro dies.



Other points:

"Life, Liberty etc" is not in the constitution it's in the Declaration of Independence which, while a wonderful work of prose, has no legal standing.



Did I see someone use the Federalist papers to advance a Jeffersonian position?



Someone raised the question of whether an insurance company issuing me an insurance policy for my state in my state is actually inter-state commerce. He may actually have a point.



"Froman", you may like to believe that you would thrive in your (for lack of a better term) libertarian paradise but I imagine your existence would be rather Hobbesian; miserable and short.







James_Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2003, 02:20 PM   #33
seruzawa
The Toad

 
seruzawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: 8501 ft.
Posts: 17,461
Default Re: 100 Lawmakers Support End Biker Health Insurance Bias

Yes, but today we no longer bother with the amendment process. It's too inconvenient. We rely on the Supreme Court to generate penumbras so that we can discover all kind of new rights that no one ever noticed before.



Jeeez. Just look at SC decisions. They have completely destroyed the 4th amendment for example. So-called conservative judges are just as guilty as liberals.
__________________
"Make no mistake, Communism lost a big argument - one we know today as the 20th century."
seruzawa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2003, 02:26 PM   #34
BMW4VWW
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,833
Default Re: 100 Lawmakers Support End Biker Health Insurance Bias

If ferb actually has a copy of the constitution perahaps he hasn't read enough of it to come to the part that allows for the LEGAL amendment process. It is in this context and only in this context that the framers allowed for any changes to be made to our paramount governing document. Our founding fathers were prescient enough know that some fine tuning of the constitution might be necessary so they carefully laid out a process that protected our republican form of governance. There was never any intent to have changes made by some government official deciding that today's needs required someone to reinterpet the clearly stated rules laid out in that contract with the people. VWW
BMW4VWW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2003, 02:28 PM   #35
seruzawa
The Toad

 
seruzawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: 8501 ft.
Posts: 17,461
Default Re: 100 Lawmakers Support End Biker Health Insurance Bias

Who do you think "regulators" are? They are people who are looking for nice fat retirement jobs in the area of business they regulate. Just look at the revolving doors. Defense and FDA are prime examples of people who protect private business interests while in govt so that they can get a sweet retirement job down the line. Insurance regulators are no different. Protect Travellers Ins Co. and get a nice sinecure when you retire!
__________________
"Make no mistake, Communism lost a big argument - one we know today as the 20th century."
seruzawa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2003, 03:07 PM   #36
BMW4VWW
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,833
Default Re: 100 Lawmakers Support End Biker Health Insurance Bias

Mr. Brown, Limits on legislative authority are the exact reason that anti-federalist factions insisted on the inclusion of the Bill of Rights prior to ratifying the Constitution. It was specifically because of our forefathers fears that people like you would attempt to bastardize the original intent of the framers that we have the first ten amendments. Please read Articles Nine and Ten in particular.



BTW how dare you include the unconstitutional atrocity known as the Civil War in any discussion on constitutional rights. I would suggest that you give Tomas DiLorenzo's book The Real Lincoln a careful read prior to your next mention of the Civil War. VWW
BMW4VWW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2003, 03:55 PM   #37
BMW4VWW
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,833
Default Re: 100 Lawmakers Support End Biker Health Insurance Bias

seurzawa, if you're reminding me how the system of business patronage to government bureaucrats works, just to get that vein on my forehead to bulge out even farther, you've suceeded. VWW
BMW4VWW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2003, 06:43 PM   #38
kowalke67
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 291
Default Re: 100 Lawmakers Support End Biker Health Insurance Bias

Okay fine, you don't want the govt' messing in private business affairs so who is going to keep private business from running all over our rights? If you didn't have some form of watch dog on private business you will just as quickly see your rights erode as you will by not keeping an eye on the govt'. Checks and balances. When private business grows so large and becomes so financially powerful that it's actions have a resounding affect on the people it has to be checked. Fortunately (or unfortunately depending on where your interests are) groups like the AMA, NRA, etc. help do that and the do it through lobbying politicians, i.e. the government. Do you really think the insurance companies are hurting because they have to honor company insurance policies for motorcyclists? Of course not, they are just trying to add to their already big pile of money. Private business canÂ’t be trusted any more to be principled than govtÂ’. If someone didn't step in there, before you know it insurance companies won't honor insurance policies for skiing/snowboarding, bike riding, ice fishing, or badminton. Whatever they can deem dangerous so they can make an extra buck. If you can't afford or are denied insurance because of an activity you participate in you won't be doing it (at least not for long) and in that way private business can take away your rights. What is the solution to that? Ride without insurance? A ridiculous solution for many reasons. Move to Liberia? IÂ’m sure that motorcycles and insurance are low on their priority list these days. The best solution is to support lobbyist groups that support what you want. IÂ’m in the NRA. I donÂ’t like everything they stand for but it is the only group with enough influence to protect the rights I do want to keep. ItÂ’s take and give. Same with our govtÂ’. Sometimes they make legislation to our benefit and sometimes they just ***** you off. ItÂ’s a constant struggle that hopefully will keep things somewhat in balance.



In this insurance case, we as motorcycle riders are fortunate for the govtÂ’ intervention. When the govt tells us our bikes canÂ’t have more than 35 hp weÂ’ll be crying and cussing. Hopefully the AMA will prevent that from happening just like they did this bs insurance policy business.



On another note, don't you think you are overlooking a key point when you say:



"Don't forget that if the government can force insurance companies to insure us against their will at our behest, government can also force all of us to ride 5 hp motorcycles when those companies start squawking about insuring our "risky" behavior."



Right, at our behest. We, meaning those of us in the AMA, helped protect our rights through our govt'. Isn't that one of the most important parts of our freedom? To have a govt' that works for us based on what we want?
__________________
\"Wait, I think I just -- Yea, I just had an idea.\"
kowalke67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2003, 03:28 AM   #39
TLCoan
Registered Member
 
TLCoan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5
Default Re: 100 Lawmakers Support End Biker Health Insurance Bias

It is good that someone can make a profit, at what point is it abuse. I do not mind if they make a decent profit but lets not go overboard."Enron"
TLCoan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2003, 03:38 AM   #40
basel1120
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 29
Default Re: 100 Lawmakers Support End Biker Health Insurance Bias

"Someone raised the question of whether an insurance company issuing me an insurance policy for my state in my state is actually inter-state commerce. He may actually have a point."



Actually, this point is no more valid than the rest of the fourth grade constitutional interpretations put forth in these threads. The fact that insurance coverage extends beyond the border of one's state is easily sufficient to qualify as interstate commerce.

basel1120 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off