|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Administrator
![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: On My Bike
Posts: 0
|
Original Article: Roehr Motorcycles 1250sc Review Please discuss the Motorcycle.com article Roehr Motorcycles 1250sc Review in our Motorcycle Forums below. Use the reply button to let others know your comments or feedback on the article. Constructive criticism is always appreciated, along with your thoughts and personal opinions on the bikes and products we have tested. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | Remove Advertisements |
|
Motorcycle Forum Advertisement |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: VIsiting the GIft Shop in the Pit of DIspair
Posts: 7,118
|
Pretty interesting stuff; the bike everyone thought Buell would build instead comes from a small, relatively unknown manufacturer. Buell said he couldn't build a proper sportbike with the Revolution engine, but if I'm reading your comments right Kevin, apparently it can be done. What do you think the future holds for Roehr? A boutique, almost custom builder of extremely limited (and expensive) bikes, or a company with the potential to reach a larger market? This is the second new US sportbike tested recently...a trend?
__________________
www.kennethmoore.org |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 159
|
Indeed, this would seem to be such a better effort at creating an equal/new American performance standard, vs Big Four... then again its apples vs oranges, really.
If the bike just tested were half as much, the comparison would obviously favor Roehr so much more. In an alternate Uni, give both Honchos a budget, all the same bits, and a certain retail price-cap for final Frankenstien, and i wonder who would create the winner. BTW, ill take Roehrs old two stroke, please. Please. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Motorcycle.com Staff
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,062
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,857
|
Give this guy credit for sticking with it. It's a shame that it's ready to roll when nobody has any equity in their homes.
Maybe Klazy Ken can help him with low low financing! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,597
|
this bike's got its own front straight? ****, man that is worth thee price of admission!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Super Duper Mod Man
![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Anywhere they let me
Posts: 10,484
|
Holy crap! Look who rose from the dead!
__________________
I'm a knucklehead |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Motorcycle.com Staff
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 103
|
I'm actually shocked that forced induction never made it back into motorcycles. Not especially for ultra high performance by the way. A modern Honda CX sport tourer would be an awesome machine. Other concepts easily spring to mind.
Small displacement forced induction engines for cars, bikes too, are the best answer for economy. GM, of all companies is going to be the first with a car in the US market using this concept by the way. The Cobalt replacement will have a 1400cc turbo engine with 150HP peak and it will get 40mpg. |
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|











