|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#41 | |
|
Motorcycle.com Staff
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,062
|
Quote:
Rear-wheel horsepower in the low 90s. Quarter-mile in the low 13s (maybe high 12s with enough traction). 0-60 in about 4.0 secs. That's the best my butt dyno can offer. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | Remove Advertisements |
|
Motorcycle Forum Advertisement |
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lightly Fortified Compound (apartment): Chicago, IL
Posts: 421
|
Not poking fun at all. I wanted to see some large, hi-res pics. Obviously all I managed to do though is prove I'm a tard for not finding them at the bottom of the article...(or proven they could be more conspicuous, as in the days of yore)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 4,129
|
Bi- isn't just for cycles and co-eds. Things evolve. Just 'cause the thing has three wheels dosn't mean crap in todays market. Why do I say this? You "geeks" out there go to the US patent website and type in Harley three wheel patent application. YEP!, you will see a patent for HD that is a cross between the MP3 and the Spyder. SO- when HD starts rolling Full Dressers out the door with three wheels in 2-4 yrs are you "purist" going to start ragging on and stop buying HD products? Didn't think soooooo......... Remember, you "purist" whined when water-cooled bikes came around and look at the scene today. Even HD followed. Evolution is not a bad thing. Some of you neanderthals (sp?) need to step into the 21st century- think innovation. Can-Am did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Snuggles
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In a really, really, really old farmhouse
Posts: 4,369
|
With a spare one for parts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,875
|
I still think it was a fun ride. I'd buy a used one in a few years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
The Toad
![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: 8501 ft.
Posts: 17,398
|
Especially from people who have never ridden one.
__________________
http://www.badmovies.org/movies/deadalive/ I kick @ss for the Lord! |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Women Riders Moderator
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,609
|
Even accepting your basic argument, a three wheeler is not an evolution of a two-wheeled vehicle.
__________________
Frappé LaRue *Safety Queen* Are you a Rounder? Sarnali: "what could be more useless than arguing with a deaf female lawyer????" |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,490
|
Can it be that idiot proof? I know a guy who tipped over a bus when cornering.
- cruiz-euro |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 4,129
|
I never said it was an evolution of a two-wheeled vehicle. I was referring to the evolution of the Motorcycle industry. No one ever said that motorcycles were limited to two wheels. The term motorcycle should not be limited to "motored-bicycle". Just becasue you can trike a "Wing" or a FLH doesn't make it less of a "cycle". When the DOT accepts quads as street legal (it will happen) don't you think that they will be considered "cycles" by DOT rules? I do. Now imagine the new Yamaha Raptor 700 with dot lights and street tires. It may be wide, but supermoto junkies everywhere would love thins idea. Current "sport atv" models in the 500-700cc range can easily hold 60-75mph speeds. All of this but yeat- it's still a cycle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Premium Member
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: pet****...pet****...pet****
Posts: 1,865
|
Ah, I was just wondering because I'm 20 something and have complained before about the lack of high-res pics.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|










