Go Back   Motorcycle Forum > Motorcycle.Com General Discussion > Motorcycle General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-18-2013, 07:47 PM   #41
seruzawa
The Toad

 
seruzawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: 8501 ft.
Posts: 17,461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmdonald View Post
Wouldn't it make more sense to divide the kilowatt hours to charge by the miles ridden instead of some contrived miles per gallon metric?
.... instead of some contrived miles per gallon metric?

You answered your own question. The EPA's figures can be anything they wish it to be.

These are the people who are adopting fleet standards of 54.4 mpg by 2025. This means that to make up for 15-20 mpg trucks there will have to be cars in large numbers getting 60-70 mpg. I doubt that it can be done in cars that can carry 4 adults with all the bells and whistles... they all eat energy y'know. Even with stratified charge engines. Gasoline just doesn't contain that much energy.

I imagine it will boil down to making everyone do with less, unless you are one of the special elite.
__________________
"Make no mistake, Communism lost a big argument - one we know today as the 20th century."

Last edited by seruzawa : 04-18-2013 at 08:11 PM.
seruzawa is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
Motorcycle Forum
Advertisement
Old 04-20-2013, 12:49 AM   #42
Kevin_Duke
Motorcycle.com Staff

 
Kevin_Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,087
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buzglyd View Post
Who towed you home?

Ha ha!
No towing, silly! We used a truck.
__________________
"The trouble with the world is that the Stupid are c0cksure and the Intelligent are full of doubt." -Bertrand Russell
Kevin_Duke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off