Go Back   Motorcycle Forum > Motorcycle.Com General Discussion > Motorcycle General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-14-2011, 06:09 PM   #11
czsummy
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 44
Default

that is more bike than anyone needs, that has quite the kick to it i dig it
czsummy is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
Motorcycle Forum
Advertisement
Old 10-15-2011, 03:31 AM   #12
schizuki
Founding Member
 
schizuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,030
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by seruzawa View Post
Well, I for one and glad that they did something about the old ZX-14's lack of power.
Buy now and they'll throw in a free bottle of Extenze.
__________________
Reverēre meam auctōritātem

Bill Clinton and Chuck Schumer are praising the Supreme Court for overturning an anti-gay-marriage law that they both signed.
schizuki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2011, 07:48 AM   #13
sarnali2
Aging Cafe` Racer

 
sarnali2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sittin' down by my window, lookin' at the rain.
Posts: 8,719
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schizuki View Post
Buy now and they'll throw in a free bottle of Extenze.

"You'll need every one of those 200+ HP to haul your tackle around when you try new and improved Extenze! "
__________________
"Carpe` Throttelum -Loud Suits Save Lives"

"He said he's farting because of his medication"...
sarnali2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2011, 07:23 AM   #14
rsalco
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin_Duke View Post
Back in '06, OEMs were still using their bogus "dry weights," which was basically invented numbers that had no basis in reality. The last few years have seen the emergence of curb weights, which are pretty much factual. Re the 14R, it'll accelerate quicker, I'm sure.
Yes, that's true, for years the published or advertised weights were calculated from the bill of materials for the particular bike, not a physical weight. Still, 100+ lbs.??? I just don't think that's likely. And, since my first post, info has been posted up in Europe that the new bike is 197 hp at the crank, 207 at speed with the ram-air. Seems t'me if it's faster tho' heavier that can only come about with an increase in mid-range torque which would make sense with the added displacement. And some tuning to focus on that. After all, in 1/4 mi. acceleration - what Kawi is touting - the first 60' are critical, and that's mid-range torque.

Anyway, it'll be interesting to see the road tests.
rsalco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2011, 08:29 AM   #15
Kevin_Duke
Motorcycle.com Staff

 
Kevin_Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,087
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rsalco View Post
Yes, that's true, for years the published or advertised weights were calculated from the bill of materials for the particular bike, not a physical weight. Still, 100+ lbs.??? I just don't think that's likely. And, since my first post, info has been posted up in Europe that the new bike is 197 hp at the crank, 207 at speed with the ram-air. Seems t'me if it's faster tho' heavier that can only come about with an increase in mid-range torque which would make sense with the added displacement. And some tuning to focus on that. After all, in 1/4 mi. acceleration - what Kawi is touting - the first 60' are critical, and that's mid-range torque.

Anyway, it'll be interesting to see the road tests.
I managed a 9.85 on the old one, uncorrected, which converts to about a 9.60 when corrected for temperature and elevation. The new one's gotta be at least two-tenths quicker, maybe three. We'll find out how quick in about a month.
__________________
"The trouble with the world is that the Stupid are c0cksure and the Intelligent are full of doubt." -Bertrand Russell
Kevin_Duke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2011, 11:22 AM   #16
rsalco
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin_Duke View Post
I managed a 9.85 on the old one, uncorrected, which converts to about a 9.60 when corrected for temperature and elevation. The new one's gotta be at least two-tenths quicker, maybe three. We'll find out how quick in about a month.
Be lookin' foward to it!

There may be a new bike in my future!
rsalco is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off