![]() |
Motorcycle Forum
(http://www.motorcycle.com/forum/)
- Motorcycle General Discussion
(http://www.motorcycle.com/forum/motorcycle-general-discussion/)
- - 2011 Triumph Speed Triple 1050 Review
(http://www.motorcycle.com/forum/motorcycle-general-discussion/18294-2011-triumph-speed-triple-1050-review.html)
2011 Triumph Speed Triple 1050 Review
Original Article: 2011 Triumph Speed Triple 1050 Review Please discuss the Motorcycle.com article 2011 Triumph Speed Triple 1050 Review in our Motorcycle Forums below. Use the reply button to let others know your comments or feedback on the article. Constructive criticism is always appreciated, along with your thoughts and personal opinions on the bikes and products we have tested. |
Now it looks even more like a 'pre-crashed' bike!
Always the lead contender for the "Easiest Bike to Lose Your License With." Maybe someone will come out with a Flyscreen/round headlamp nacelle. It'd look kinda like an upside-down Groucho nose/mask... |
2011 Speed Triple suspension
The downloadable Speed Triple Owners Manual on the Triumph web site contains this statement:
WARNING! The rear suspension unit spring pre-load is not rider adjustable. Any attempt to adjust the spring pre-load could result in a dangerous riding condition leading to loss of control and an accident. This is probably for a 2010 model so I'm wondering if your statement that the 2011 rear suspension is fully adjustable is accurate. The rear suspension was being touted as being "fully adjustable" by the magazines and Triumph's own web site back in 2005 when I bought my "05 Speed Triple. Imagine my chagrin when I tried to move those rear preload rings and found them welded together! |
I'm not a huge fan of the new styling. However, it does sound like the changes that were made under the skin were worthwhile.
Totally agree with the recommendation for a round headlight option/accessory. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:21 AM. |
