Go Back   Motorcycle Forum > Other > Motorcycle.Com Lounge

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-18-2010, 07:16 AM   #1
Kenneth_Moore
Registered Member
 
Kenneth_Moore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: VIsiting the GIft Shop in the Pit of DIspair
Posts: 7,118
Default The Internets

A pretty interesting article on the Internet from 35 years ago:

On an NBC News broadcast in 1975, correspondent Ford Rowan reported on a "whole new technology that not many people know about." The technology, Rowan said, was government funded, and its widespread use had the ominous potential for Orwellian consequences as predicted in the book, "1984."

The technology Rowan talked about was ARPANET (Advanced Research Projects Agency Network), a research program developed in 1969 that created the technical infrastructure that eventually became the Internet. Viewers were warned that citizens’ private data could be sent via phone line from one government computer to another. In other words, Big Brother was in the making.

Before Rowan’s report, there was little television reporting on the early development of the Internet. Now, more than 40 years after the creation of ARPANET, the Internet has dramatically transformed the news and information landscape. The instantaneous availability of the Internet — and its social networking progeny — means news consumers can find almost anything, anytime, anywhere, free of charge.

These days, the big debate surrounding the Internet isn’t about privacy or secrecy but about whether content should remain open, equal, unregulated and for the most part, free. The new buzzword in this debate is "net neutrality," whose supporters — Google, Yahoo! and other content providers — are pitted against AT&T, Verizon and other broadband providers who argue that free access is simply freeloading.
The telecoms claim that growing digital content is straining already taxed networks. They want to impose new fees for a new tiered system that would ensure nonstop and quick content delivery for those who can afford it.

But content providers see Orwellian red flags in the tiered system, with consequences closer to "Animal Farm" than "1984." They fear those who can’t afford the fees would essentially be shut out of the process, resulting in an Internet that’s not accessible to all.
__________________
www.kennethmoore.org
Kenneth_Moore is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
Motorcycle Forum
Advertisement
Old 01-18-2010, 07:21 AM   #2
seruzawa
The Toad

 
seruzawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: 8501 ft.
Posts: 17,461
Default

Well, if people can't afford vacations in the Bahamas they are shut out too. Is everything now a "right" that has to be provided "free"? I didn't know that the internet was a "right" now.

You can go to the library and go on the internet. you can borrow books there too. There are lots of solutions for losers.
__________________
"Make no mistake, Communism lost a big argument - one we know today as the 20th century."
seruzawa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2010, 07:28 AM   #3
Dr_Sprocket
Founding Member
 
Dr_Sprocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Delmarva Peninsula
Posts: 2,331
Default

I thought Al Gore created the internet. *confused*
Dr_Sprocket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2010, 07:32 AM   #4
schizuki
Founding Member
 
schizuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,030
Default

Well, those '70s folks got it all wrong, didn't they? The greatest impact of the Internet from the standpoint of liberty was its effect on breaking the old-media monopoly over reporting and commentary. Before, when you knew the media was lying about something, who did you tell? Now bloggers can expose the truth to everyone in seconds. If the old media didn't want to run a story, they sat on it. Now the pajamas media tells it. Big Brother isn't watching us, we're watching him.

The question of paying for content is dicey. TANSTAAFL. I'd like to see it remain as-is, but I don't buy the "those who can’t afford the fees would essentially be shut out of the process, resulting in an Internet that’s not accessible to all" argument. Life is full of things that aren't accessible to all. That's life. Tough. I'd bet that the majority of people who couldn't afford it just Facebook and YouTube anyway.
__________________
Reverēre meam auctōritātem

Bill Clinton and Chuck Schumer are praising the Supreme Court for overturning an anti-gay-marriage law that they both signed.
schizuki is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off