|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#51 |
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 237
|
![]() Thanks, minime. Some of us out here sincerely appreciate your effort to provide more than a regurgitation of ad copy. Keep it up.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links | Remove Advertisements |
Motorcycle Forum Advertisement |
|
![]() |
#52 |
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 89
|
![]() ... is that it is BUTT ugly and cooks your legs and feet.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 89
|
![]() The Market doesn't seem to want 4 cylinder cruisers? Tell Honda who sell Magnas very well. Or Yamaha who have been known to sell V-Maxxes fairly steadily over the years.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 89
|
![]() >>>. Yamaha would not even have to spend on engineering or revisions to the FJ, just bring it here. <<<<
So in boxjoints world Yamaha they doesn't have to conform to US EPA and DOT requirements, huh? ![]() Hee hee hee. That's a pretty competitve market there for the FJ. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2
|
![]() The Warrior should handle curves very well, it has radial tires, a rigid aluminum frame, great brakes and excellent suspension components. I think it would be a blast on a back road.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2
|
![]() The VTX weighs 120lbs more than the warrior, sells for $12,499-12,799. What are you talking about extra front disc? The Road Star Standard has dual disks as does the VTX. The warrior will have a better power to weigh ratio and will definately handle better.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 |
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2
|
![]() Sorry Yamaha, that is one ugly motorcycle! It looks like it was thrown together. I thought the VTX exhaust was ugly, but you beat it hands down with your Warrior exhaust.
The VTX looks custom. The Warrior looks like a hurried attempt at catch up to Honda. At least you lowered the weight. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 |
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 110
|
![]() 65.7 inch wheelbase, and a 200 section rear tire? Sounds like smooth and slow to me.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 |
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 72
|
![]() Ok, you did get me on that one
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 |
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 13
|
![]() did you say (The other gallon is hiding in a cell under the seat). well i guess thats a small step in the v-max direction. i know this is feed back on the warrior but i notice guys wondering if this or the bulldog would have been the new v-max . well thank god they aint. the last thing i want is my max to become is another cruiser clone or power ranger bike. i think its great that the v-max is still the same for 17 years and looks fantastic as it is , and when you flick the wrist at any speed.......damn its a launch . wanna stop making the v-max......okay i got mine already. wanna turn it into another clone...no thanks .let the legendary max keep its unique looks and balls .retire the bike with its name
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
Thread Tools | |
|
|