Go Back   Motorcycle Forum > Motorcycle.Com General Discussion > Motorcycle News > Old News > MO Reader Feedback

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-05-2001, 05:43 AM   #11
jared
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8
Default Re: Triumph Tiger Reader Feedback

By the way, I've got a 2000 SV650 or sale if you're in the Austin, TX area.
jared is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
Motorcycle Forum
Advertisement
Old 05-05-2001, 06:11 AM   #12
davidcorr
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 16
Default Re: Triumph Tiger Reader Feedback

i'm a big fan of m.o. check in at least once a day.



but this review was way below par.



more of an exercise in "clever" writing than anything.



a few paragraphs about us vs. them. most of which is inaccurate. for example, the vast majority of brits prefer their road bikes to be sport bikes, not "to look like dirt bikes." also, they're not particularly fond of being grouped in the "euro" category.



as for the meat of the review - slim pickings. a few superficial comments about the engine, hard bags, etc. brochure material at best.



and a bit about "getting the back end out." wow, aren't we studs.



guys, read the article. then ask yourselves if this would be of any real value to you.



i really like this site. but you need to be harder on yourselves if you want respect from your readers.



suggestion. do the review over.

davidcorr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2001, 07:24 AM   #13
tigerboy
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1
Default Re: Triumph Tiger Reader Feedback

I have to agree with David. I think this article was very superficial. They didn't even go as far as taking their own pictures of the bike in action. They got them from the Triumph website. I have waited forever to read about this bike, and this is the best they could do? Did they even really ride the thing, or did they just talk to the reps? I have been forced to endure how many articles on the R1 and the R6, and one article on a different bike comes out, and it's like they didn't even go to work. Just went out for fish & chips or something...jeez!!! I am one of those contrarian, dual-sport-adventure-tourer nuts, and I love the look of both the Tiger and the Beemer. I would definitely own the Beemer if money were no object, and I have a Tiger on order. The Beemer has a great feel. Sat on one at Sturgis last year. The Tiger is two months behind schedule right now for showing up. We don't know why, except a possible case of brake & throttle disease may be holding it up in customs. I plan to ride the bike myself to at least find out what I like/don't like as no one seems to agree on it. One thing they do agree on in Europe is the buffeting from the wind is intolerable, and Triumph has not done much to work on this. Call Craig Vetter or something, boys! They also never responded to me as to why for the last two years they have dissed the dealer and not shown up for the Sturgis Rally. Every other manufacturer in the business came last year, along with ca. 700K bikes and about double the people. Their response to one of my buddies was "they didn't want to cater to that type of biker." Huh? At any rate, I think this style of bike is far underrated. For me, the dirtbike seating position is much more comfortable than the cruiser or sportbike styles, and I want a bike that can pretty much do anything/go anywhere I wanna go. The dealer here tries very hard, (unlike many dealers I have shopped at), but the BMW guys are very friendly and successful too. If it comes down to a lack of information, and if the bike doesn't show up for another month, I may just have to finance a little and go for the ugly duckling instead of the big green highlighter.
tigerboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2001, 07:29 AM   #14
starvingstudent
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 486
Default Re: Triumph Tiger Reader Feedback

Well, I've got about $300 to my name right now (yes, that's three hundred, not three thousand). So, unless you're selling _real_ cheap... I hope that after a year of working, I'll be able to have one for next summer. Thanks for the offer, though.
starvingstudent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2001, 04:54 PM   #15
BenjiH
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 12
Default Re: Triumph Tiger Reader Feedback

I've never really understood what these kind of bikes are supposed to do for you. I've seen people up in the mountains here in Georgia riding them thar BMW GSwhatever they're called, but I don't get the point. Like the article said, a motorcross bike with lights would be better for off-road stuff. Yes, I know to each his own and all that crap, but I just look at these bikes like I look at SUVs, people want to pretend they're adventureous even though they're on pavement 99.9% of the time. Maybe if I had a ten mile long gravel driveway..........
BenjiH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2001, 05:00 PM   #16
FrankS1
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 156
Default Re: Triumph Tiger Reader Feedback

First, I'm registered as FrankS1, but the text editor calls me "Anonymous Squid". The cookie your server planted knows who I am (no neither a "biscuit" nor a "scone", the cookie here is made of 1's and 0's). It says "Welcome MO user FrankS1" rith on top of this very screen. Get your resident computer nerd to instruct the comment text editor to speak to the main part of the server.



Now for motorcycle comments.



We've had well-phrased comments from a reader who liked BMW, got a Triumph, and doesn't like it that well. Now for a reader who likes Triumphs, has a BMW and wondered if he made a mistake.



Well, first, MO, I have no idea whether I'd like riding the new Tiger or not. "One lane gravel roads." conveys no data. From the crest on Ortega Highway, one gravel road leads to Silverado, the other to Rancho California. Did you turn off on either one? Any side roads off the main crest roads? Well, you at least did make it abundantly clear I'd need a new wind screen.



Just for a few pluses and minuses of my big R1100GS for comparison: The major plus is handling on rough and potholed paved roads. I have overtaken young and fearless riders when their plastic wrapped Big 4 sports bikes were bouncing out on curves (they accelerate away on the straights, of course). The next major plus is touring comfort, with electrical heat of the garments, lots of room in the hard case luggage, indifference to crosswinds and rain, and oh yes, don't let any hotshot sport bike rider tell you he can do a better braking job than the ABS when there's water running across the road. (Get him to buy a life insurance policy naming you as beneficiary, then wait for a rain storm.) While the OEM windshield is no prize, the aftermarket windshields are readily available.



But.. The BMW is awful big and tall and heavy. I've lost it on loose sand, and getting it back up is no treat at all. Even with the seat in low position and my 33" inseam pants, it can get awkward to maneuver. The Germans "know what is best for you" in the suspension department, and it is NOT repeat NOT best for me. Too soft in front, and too much rebound damping in back - it squats on washboard. The front has an Ohlins, and the one of these days the rear will also. That adds a lot to the cost of a very expensive machine.



But to save the worst for last. There isn't any way to get a stump puller low gear. My home is at 8000 feet elevation, and the interesting rough roads are higher. The fuel injection doesn't bog, but there is only 2/3 of sea level air up here, and torque goes down proportionately. That's an immutable law of physics, which BMW acts like they don't know about. So I get into the situation where I'd like to pick over the boulders at 10 mph, but I have to go 25 mph - or grossly abuse the clutch. With a chain drive bike, I'd slap on a new sprocket before heading to the boonies, but you can't do that with a BMW!



So, OK, mister MO reviewer: What's the situation with the chains and sprockets on the Triumph? Don't tell us the rear sprocket is welded on. It isn't, is it?
FrankS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2001, 06:26 PM   #17
BammBamm
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 110
Default Re: Triumph Tiger Reader Feedback

Buy a cheapy dirt bike and Supermotard it yourself with Baja Designs kits and parts. I just got an XR 650 L, and I'm getting a second set of wheels and tires for the street. More fun than you can believe under 100 mph.
BammBamm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2001, 06:32 PM   #18
BammBamm
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 110
Default Re: Triumph Tiger Reader Feedback

Borrow or rent one and you'll see. You can have all kinds of fun on them without worrying about tankslappers, high-sides... Go excellent on rough roads, dirt roads, and some go good on the dirt too. You can smoke a hyper sports bike on bad roads too. No wrist ache, back ache...
BammBamm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2001, 07:01 PM   #19
starvingstudent
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 486
Default Re: Triumph Tiger Reader Feedback

Sure, some people ride GS's to look and feel like Indiana Jones. But is that any different than people who ride like to ride CBGSXZXRRRRs to look like racers, even though they've never been on a track? Or people who like cruisers, so they look like Captain America or Billy even though they work in a cubicle? Every genre has pose factor.



The big GSs are really good for the street, though: lots of torque, good ground clearance, and a practical seating position.
starvingstudent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2001, 07:50 PM   #20
desertbilly
Founding Member
 
desertbilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 134
Default Re: Triumph Tiger Reader Feedback

It probably has a lot to do with where you live. Arizona is mostly public land that is criss-crossed by, literally, tens of thousands of miles of gravel roads, dirt roads, forrest roads, and jeep trails which are great for 'adventure touring.' Sure there's also a lot of hiking, horse and single-track trails that these bikes are too big for, but that's okay. It's not really 'off-road riding'; it's more 'crappy-road riding.'



These bikes (I've got a KLR650) are great for being able to handle the interstate/blacktop to a national forrest, and then being able to go farther into the interior, as long as there's some semblance of a road. It's a very fun and rewarding type of motorcycling.



I suspect many of the other western states are similar.
desertbilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off