Go Back   Motorcycle Forum > Motorcycle.Com General Discussion > Motorcycle News > Old News > MO Reader Feedback

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-16-2004, 10:56 AM   #81
nokneedragin
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 771
Default Re: 2005 Kawasaki ZX-6R

Here is a quick Google for you

http://www.monito.com/wankel/norton.html
nokneedragin is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
Motorcycle Forum
Advertisement
Old 12-16-2004, 11:09 AM   #82
12er
Founding Member
 
12er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SF
Posts: 2,801
Default Re: 600cc's-not hardly!

Personally I thought Anthony's unit wagging jesture to Yates was just too much. I had tears in my eyes after that one, laughed myself silly. Needless to say I was a Yates fan no longer after that outburst.
12er is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2004, 11:18 AM   #83
jungkvist
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 955
Default Re: 600cc's-not hardly!

A 750 triple might finally put Triumph on the map. Who cares, if it isn't a race replica; I sure don't...How many guys actually race these things, anyway.



Since the SV-1000 is the only big V-twin, living anywhere near the $10K-neighborhood, a 750 triple might be a nice comprimise.
__________________
Yeah, well, you can get up and leave, DEAL WITH IT!
jungkvist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2004, 11:43 AM   #84
seruzawa
The Toad

 
seruzawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: 8501 ft.
Posts: 17,461
Default Re: Dang you didn't pass him!

I Sean comes up with any more excuses for losing he could qualify as an NFL analyst.
__________________
"Make no mistake, Communism lost a big argument - one we know today as the 20th century."
seruzawa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2004, 11:49 AM   #85
pdad13
Founding Member
 
pdad13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,754
Default Re: But LongNazi you said that 600s are Which is it?

I think he's speaking in relative terms. It's pretty clear he was saying that the new 600s are too powerful to be considered starter bikes. And an arugment can certainly be made that they're not ideal street bikes based on their powerbands. Although, they seem to be getting better in the torque department.
pdad13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2004, 12:01 PM   #86
BMW4VWW
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,833
Default Re: But LongNazi you said that 600s are Which is it?

Uh, Pdad I think he just said that they're uncomfortable, which for those of us who aren't vertically they defiately are, although you make a good point about the powerband. Good low end torque does make for a better street bike, especially for duty in city traffic. VWW
BMW4VWW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2004, 12:52 PM   #87
seruzawa
The Toad

 
seruzawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: 8501 ft.
Posts: 17,461
Default Re: But LongNazi you said that 600s are Which is it?

longride has never said that 600s were slow. In fact no GPTB member has. Kook is just delusional as usual.



What would Kook know anyhow? He's never ridden anything except a ZX6.
__________________
"Make no mistake, Communism lost a big argument - one we know today as the 20th century."
seruzawa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2004, 01:03 PM   #88
BMW4VWW
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,833
Default Re: But LongNazi you said that 600s are Which is it?

Vetically challenged. VWW
BMW4VWW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2004, 01:10 PM   #89
nbyers
Registered Member
 
nbyers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Jet City, WA
Posts: 227
Default Me Lazy Too

Bingo.
nbyers is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off