Go Back   Motorcycle Forum > Motorcycle.Com General Discussion > Motorcycle News > Old News > MO Reader Feedback

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-25-2002, 08:08 PM   #1
rsalas
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 6
Default Re: 2002 Openclass Shootout, Part I

i would just like to know why the zx9r wasn't included. its stock horsepower is just as much as the 954 but with 54 less cc's. with the $1100 dollars you save on the 9r you could easily drop 20 or more pounds, add an extra 7 or so horsepower and have money to spare. You would also have a comfortable bike. And if you REALLY wanted to level the field. add a 98 cc MUZZYS big bore kit and you will smoke em all. By the way I own a '02 9r and the 954's and R1's still cant hang light to light!!!!!
rsalas is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
Motorcycle Forum
Advertisement
Old 03-25-2002, 08:10 PM   #2
rsalas
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 6
Default Re: 2002 Openclass Shootout, Part I

i would just like to know why the zx9r wasn't included. its stock horsepower is just as much as the 954 but with 54 less cc's. with the $1100 dollars you save on the 9r you could buy an exhaust and easily drop 20 or more pounds, add an extra 7 or so horsepower and have money to spare. You would also have a comfortable bike. And if you REALLY wanted to level the field. add a 98 cc MUZZYS big bore kit and you will smoke em all. By the way I own a '02 9r and the 954's and R1's still cant hang light to light!!!!!
rsalas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2002, 08:58 PM   #3
hackfu
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 99
Default Re: 2002 Openclass Shootout, Part I

As indicated within the context of the story, the Kawasaki ZX-9R was not included in the test due to scheduling conflicts. We have no doubt that the ZX-9R is the ultimate motorcycle for your needs. However, to reiterate, the Kawasaki ZX-9R could not make our test due to scheduling conflicts.



Understanding this, stay tuned for when we finally do get our hands on the new ZX-9R as we'll be doing exactly what you stated. We'll hopefully be fixing it up and seeing what it'll do.
hackfu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2002, 11:40 PM   #4
bluedot
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 65
Default Re: 2002 Openclass Shootout, Part I

IMO, you should just call this test 1 liter sport-class MOTYÂ…



Honestly .. I don't see why you don't just include the Bimmer or the VFR ...



Yes, motorcycling is bigger than 0-60 times or how long a wheelie you can ride. However, must you now be judging all bike tests on the "mystique of motorcycling" scale ?



Is there still a place for a category where the bikes sole purpose for being, itÂ’s lineage and the uber technology that we are all lucky to have access to can be appreciated over windscreen height ? Where a thickly padded seat is a bonus rather than a requisite ?



Alas Â… obviously IÂ’m alone in my version of the "open-class" world.



Last year you crowned the R1 as winner because it was not too fast (Suz) or not too slow (Hon) but just perfect ... with this years quicker R1 and same Gix it pretty much HAS to be the Honda ... lets just hope they don't make the CBR faster for next year or Kawi might just have a chance to win one of these after all.

bluedot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2002, 03:44 AM   #5
RonXX
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 273
Default Re: 2002 Openclass Shootout, Part I

Maybe you guys could include an actual measurement of wet weight in future spec sheets.
RonXX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2002, 03:58 AM   #6
BBD_Racing
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 337
Default Re: 2002 Openclass Shootout, Part I

Now, now, Ron. Go easy on them, a couple of bathroom scales add up to a serious financial committment.
BBD_Racing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2002, 03:59 AM   #7
Haru
Founding Member
 
Haru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 154
Default English refresher needed?

<blockquote> >>I don't get to write these news thingies very much so bare with me. </blockquote>



bare with you? Please forgive me if I decline your invitation.



Haru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2002, 04:01 AM   #8
granny
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 149
Default Virtual weigh-in indeed.

So, you were able to dyno the bikes but not able get a "ready to ride, full tank of gas" weight in the comparison chart? Neither are there measurements of the seat, bars, pegs triangle nor the seat height (all typical of the specs usually provided e.g., by RoadRacing World). Considering that this test is likely not to be decided by power, one would think that first measurements would be the ergonomic factors shown in a convenient side by side comparison chart. Gosh, what's the world coming to?
granny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2002, 04:19 AM   #9
granny
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 149
Default Re: 2002 Openclass Shootout, Part I

Any performance difference between any of these bikes in the real world is most likely to come down to the riders. You should be happy in any case. Incidentally, every change made to the bike dings away at the warranty - I'd expect the warranty to essentially evaporate if a big bore kit is installed. You might not care, I would. I'm bored with fiddling with bikes, I just want to ride them. If I have to change a given bike to make into the bike really I want then it's the wrong bike for me. YMMV...
granny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2002, 04:28 AM   #10
sherm
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 22
Default Re: 2002 Openclass Shootout, Part I

Exclusion of the ZX9R is the height of moto-elitism. The latest Cycle World takes the same path as you do. But look at their own numbers for the 954 and the 9R. The 9R weighs 34 lb more, has 7 less hp, yet BEATS the 954 in 1/4 mile, 0-60, and top speed.

When you add in better ergonomics, wind protection and lower price, the only conclusion that makes any sense is that the 9R is not in your shootout because you don't want it to show up the three track pigs that its stylish to rave about.
sherm is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off