Go Back   Motorcycle Forum > Motorcycle.Com General Discussion > Motorcycle News > Old News > Misc News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-28-2005, 10:59 AM   #11
blitz
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 87
Default Re: Bike prices: ''Too high''? Factored properly in comparos?

Another factor affecting the price of ALL vehicles are government regulations. In 1970, how many bikes had catalytic converters? How many met emission standards? (The H1 was a good bug sprayer).



My 1971 SL100 didn't need a green sticker.



My 1971 R60/5 has a 7 digit VIN.



The times, they are a changing.



Now, to sell a bike, you have to meet noise regulations, emission regulation, safety regulations, NHTSA safety recalls, etc. All add to the price of our bikes. I have a 15 digit VIN on my XR250!



I remember in 1978 a new kz650 was $1700 if you bought the custom with the mag wheels. In 1979, emissions standards tightened, Kawasaki added reed valves on the exhaust ports to suck in clear air to reduce hydrocarbon emissions. That added $300 to the price of the bike. That was almost a 20% jump right there. (Of course, with the Carter administration, inflation was probably 10 or 12%, so it wasn't all emissions.)





More regulation means more cost. Just a fact of life.



blitz is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
Motorcycle Forum
Advertisement
Old 09-28-2005, 11:00 AM   #12
blitz
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 87
Default Re: Bike prices: ''Too high''? Factored properly in comparos?

Duh. Factor.....IS government regulations. How come my proofreading is better AFTER i post?
blitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2005, 11:09 AM   #13
sforbes
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 9
Default Re: Bike prices: ''Too high''? Factored properly in comparos?

Bikes today are so much better, so much more advanced in so many ways, it really is difficult to compare them to much older models based on cost adjusted for inflation. Comparing current models' tires, wheels, brakes, fuel systems, frames, suspension components, electronics - on and on - to 30-year old models would be like comparing an F-4 Phantom with an F-18 Super Hornet. Add to that that new and improved (lighter, faster) versions are releaded every couple of years and that engineering and tooling costs are spread over a relatively small number of units (we're not talking Toyota Camrys here), and that pretty much explains the price difference.
sforbes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2005, 11:10 AM   #14
seruzawa
The Toad

 
seruzawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: 8501 ft.
Posts: 17,461
Default Re: Bike prices: ''Too high''? Factored properly in comparos?

A good yardstick is to compare bike prices back then to car prices.



Consider that a new Datsun 510 sedan cost $2100 in 1971 vs $1700 for a CB750(80% of car cost). Today's sportbike for $8500 compared to $13K minimum (.65% of car cost) is a shrieking good deal. When you consider that an SV650 or a 600 Bandit or, heck, even some of the cruisers are superior to any of the 70's superbikes it's apparent that we are getting one heck of a big bang for the buck these days.



And when you look at used bikes and realize that you can get a sportbike a couple of years old for about $4K the superiority of today's bikes is undeniable.



Although we are getting dangerously close to calling it a "cost/performance ratio".
__________________
"Make no mistake, Communism lost a big argument - one we know today as the 20th century."
seruzawa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2005, 11:43 AM   #15
seruzawa
The Toad

 
seruzawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: 8501 ft.
Posts: 17,461
Default whoops

Just found an inflation calculator here. Inflation between 1970 and 2004 is 487%. So a Honda CB750 at $1495 x 4.87 should be comparable at $7280 today. Actually the last CB750 Nighthawk cost $5799 new.



A Norton Commando was about 1750 x 4.87 = $8522. Right in line with the cost of a new Triumph Thruxton and the Thruxton is a much better bike than the Norton ever was.



So I'd still say that bikes have gotten cheaper over the years.
__________________
"Make no mistake, Communism lost a big argument - one we know today as the 20th century."
seruzawa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2005, 11:52 AM   #16
acecycleins
Founding Member
 
acecycleins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 4,129
Default Re: Bike prices: ''Too high''? Factored properly in comparos?

Your money arguement is flawed by inflation rates alone. My dad owned a 73 Yam RD350 that I think sold for $1800 and his 240Z cost some $3500. Today you can't buy a new 350Z for $28k but you can buy a FZ6 for $6500. If you take in the fact that the process of building ANY vehicle has taken giant leaps in technology in 30 years, then paying $6k to $16k for any motorcycle is a bargin based on todays inflation rate. It's like the argument that we pay more for gas "at record prices" as the news media puts it. Fact is, if inflation is corrected then in the mid seventies the price per barrel of crude would be at or over $90 a barrel in today's dollars. Well, $65-$70 a barrel today looks like a bargin. If you're looking for a bargin buy used products and avoid sales tax. If you're real cheap buy on ebay like I did (for a low milage 87 K100rs for $3000). It may be 18 yrs old but it runs as good as any new bike on the road. I do apologize for the rant.
__________________
"Slack" - a state of being in which everything flows smoothly.....a frame of mind so at ease that the universe naturally cooperates.
acecycleins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2005, 12:21 PM   #17
mscuddy
MODERATOR X

 
mscuddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Next to my still checkin the temp.
Posts: 5,449
Default Re: whoops

Here here. And the new ones don't leak oil or fry electrics either.



Of course the accomplishment of getting from point A to point B without a giant bag of tools and bailing wire has kind of dimished. Makes new bikes kind of boring if you ask me.



Bring back the Ziener Diode! Hey, wait a minute, is that a Sportster engine I see in my new bike? Maybe I spoke too soon...



__________________
A gun is a tool, Marian; no better or no worse than any other tool: an axe, a shovel or anything. A gun is as good or as bad as the man using it. Remember that.
mscuddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2005, 01:10 PM   #18
sportbikebandit
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,072
Default Re: whoops

Wow. That's cool.
sportbikebandit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2005, 01:16 PM   #19
sportbikebandit
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,072
Default Ya but..

But wasn't gas about 36 cents a gallon. I think adjusted for inflation in 1970 numbers its about 70 cents. So gas has gone up in real terms in the last year. Last year it was closer to 39 cents in real terms (1970) dollars.
sportbikebandit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2005, 01:51 PM   #20
seruzawa
The Toad

 
seruzawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: 8501 ft.
Posts: 17,461
Default Re: Ya but..

When looking at gas you've got to factor in the huge increases in taxes on top of inflation. Gas taxes run around 50 cents per gallon today, an increase of probably 45 cents per gallon since 1970. So gas was about 25 cents per gallon (less taxes) in 1970 and today about 2.25 per gallon(less taxes). Using the handy dandy 4.87 factor, inflation would make gas about $1.21 today. So, yes we've seen real increases in gas prices.



But that tax money's not wasted. It's helped build a lot roads to casinos in New Orleans, bailed out a lot of incompetent Wall Street traders and fund mangers, allowed us to drop lots of bombs on Serbia and Iraq, and built a lot of buildings and bridges that say "Robert Byrd" on them, eh? Never say that our govt doesn't make good use of our money!



We still have enough money left over to buy flood insurance from Buzglyd!
__________________
"Make no mistake, Communism lost a big argument - one we know today as the 20th century."
seruzawa is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off