Go Back   Motorcycle Forum > Motorcycle.Com General Discussion > Motorcycle News > Old News > Misc News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-21-2005, 05:05 AM   #21
webdev511
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 49
Default Not with this motor

MX 4 stroke motors installed in sport/race bikes are problematic at best.



Dry oil sump, wide gearbox ratios, compact cases, cause stresses and issues that don't come up in the dirt.



The concept is sound, but it will need a redesign before it hits the street / track.



Now about putting that bored and stroked DR-Z400 motor in my RGV chassis....
webdev511 is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
Motorcycle Forum
Advertisement
Old 03-21-2005, 05:23 AM   #22
ValkBandit
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 473
Default Re: 70 HP / less than 300 lbs?

i'm with you, brother.
ValkBandit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005, 07:19 AM   #23
seruzawa
The Toad

 
seruzawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: 8501 ft.
Posts: 17,461
Default Re: 70 HP / less than 300 lbs?

Ummmm, the death of two-stroke offroad (and street) motorcycles is most definitely not the result of consumer choice. It is plain and simple govt mandate.



I'd take a two-stroke powerplant for any kind of performance riding over a four-stroke. Four-strokes make better tourers (unless you fit 10 gallon tanks to two strokes) or cruisers, but for sportbiking or dirtriding two-strokes are immeasurably superior. They would dominate still today if they could meet pollution mandates.
__________________
"Make no mistake, Communism lost a big argument - one we know today as the 20th century."
seruzawa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005, 07:28 AM   #24
Tigercub
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,125
Default Re: 70 HP / less than 300 lbs?

That would make a hell-uv-a flat-track motor! Does it sound cool?
Tigercub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005, 08:07 AM   #25
mscuddy
MODERATOR X

 
mscuddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Next to my still checkin the temp.
Posts: 5,448
Default Re: 70 HP / less than 300 lbs?

Ironic isn't it? Talk about things going full-circle.



First you had the two-stroke single replacing four stroke twins in off-road racing and riding.



Then the two stroke ruled the Earth for a while, only to be replaced by the four stroke single.



And now back to four stroke twins for off-road racing and riding.



What's next? Porridge pot helmets & Uvex goggles? Leading link forks?



Seriously though, I was watching MX on the tube the other night and noticed there were almost no 2 strokes in the 250 class.



We had to expect that, since it was only a matter of time until the factories got the technology sorted out, and 4 stokes started kicking some a$$ (without blowing up, that is).



And to top it off, my buddy who rides a KX500 is selling it and buying a new CRF450X. (I'll keep my CR500 for a few more years, thank you)



The 2 stroke is dead! Long live the 2 stroke!





__________________
A gun is a tool, Marian; no better or no worse than any other tool: an axe, a shovel or anything. A gun is as good or as bad as the man using it. Remember that.
mscuddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005, 08:15 AM   #26
Buzglyd
Founding Member
 
Buzglyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,904
Default Re: 70 HP / less than 300 lbs?

I'm still jonesing for an RD400 but I'll take a few deep breaths and let it pass.
Buzglyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005, 08:29 AM   #27
mscuddy
MODERATOR X

 
mscuddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Next to my still checkin the temp.
Posts: 5,448
Default Re: 70 HP / less than 300 lbs?

I agree somewhat, but technology is making leaps and bounds in the 4 stroke off-road game.



Lighter engine components mean more power and quicker revving. Better designs lessen reliability and maintenance issues.



And as you can see in the 250 class nowadays, hardly anyone rides a 2 stroke.



And then you have the safety nazis and environmental kooks who hate the 2 stroke for what it is, noisy and dirty. Let's face it, the two-stroke dirt bike is on the ropes, goin' down for the 10 count.



Hey, what ever happened to the Orbital 2 stroke engine design, that combined 2 and four stroke technologies? That seemed a good compromise between power and the environment (two stroke top end, four stroke lower end).

__________________
A gun is a tool, Marian; no better or no worse than any other tool: an axe, a shovel or anything. A gun is as good or as bad as the man using it. Remember that.
mscuddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005, 08:43 AM   #28
christian_gates
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 209
Default Re: 70 HP / less than 300 lbs?

I think that this bike is cool as heck, and will be a relative failure in the U.S. Without a tiered licensing structure basically mandating the purchase of low-power / small-displacement bikes, a bike like this doesn't make economic sense for most U.S. consumers.



A 600cc-ish supersport offers more performance and will continue to provide thrills, chills and probably spills too for a wider range of riders in number and for individual riders over a longer time.



Note that I'm not endorsing supersports as fundamentally "better" than this concept - outside of racing there's too much variety for that word to have much meaning in most motorcycle discussions - I'm just saying that, in the U.S., it will never really take off.



That being said, I hope against reason that they sell enough so that I can see one in person.



cdg
christian_gates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005, 09:08 AM   #29
seruzawa
The Toad

 
seruzawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: 8501 ft.
Posts: 17,461
Default Re: 70 HP / less than 300 lbs?

Hey. I went snowmobiling last weekend and on the way home in my truck we almost hit a Golden Eagle that was eating some road kill! Two bad I wasn't on a Harley, eh?
__________________
"Make no mistake, Communism lost a big argument - one we know today as the 20th century."
seruzawa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005, 09:34 AM   #30
seruzawa
The Toad

 
seruzawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: 8501 ft.
Posts: 17,461
Default Re: 70 HP / less than 300 lbs?

You know what else is ironic? The announcement of this motor isn't met by an avalanche of catcalls from MOrons about how inferior it is because it doesn't have 100+ hp. I was beginning to believe that 100HP was the minimum acceptance level for a motorcycle.
__________________
"Make no mistake, Communism lost a big argument - one we know today as the 20th century."
seruzawa is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off