Go Back   Motorcycle Forum > Motorcycle.Com General Discussion > Motorcycle News > Old News > Misc News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-18-2003, 05:33 AM   #11
seruzawa
The Toad

 
seruzawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: 8501 ft.
Posts: 17,461
Default Re: PA Helmet Law Changing

It's immaterial whether or not this bill involves motorcycle helmets. What's really at stake is how far we are willing to let the govt go to 'protect' us by removing freedom.



The argument of public burden is so openended that it is like handing politicians absolute power. Do we really want that? That argument makes it possible for the govt to justify anything it wants to do. It's all "for the public good".



The people who want all this govt largesse should just set up the system for themselves and leave the rest of us out of it. That's impossible, of course, because such losers require a large number of producers to extort money for their precious benefits.
__________________
"Make no mistake, Communism lost a big argument - one we know today as the 20th century."
seruzawa is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
Motorcycle Forum
Advertisement
Old 06-18-2003, 06:04 AM   #12
electraglider_1997
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 640
Default Helmet Laws Bite!

Here's a thought. When airliners crash everyone dies. Nobody outlaws flying in planes. When we send our son's off to war they have a good chance of dying but nobody has come up with a no war law. And when that military person dies we tax payers take the hit. Let's just put a law on everything and just hide out in the house.
electraglider_1997 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2003, 06:07 AM   #13
nferr
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 33
Default Re: PA Helmet Law Changing

I'm not going to get into the great helmet debate, but I wear one every time I ride.



But its ridiculous to say it's a freedom issue. What the heck are seatbelt laws, or airbags, or emissions controls? The government has long been in the "protection" game by removing freedoms. If you're worried about freedom why don't you complain about the total circumventing of the constitution that's going on right now under the guise of anti-terrorism.



nferr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2003, 06:31 AM   #14
webdev511
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 49
Default All fine and nice, IF...

I'm not opposed to this, so long as the rider in question can prove that in the event of a crash, the government has no liability AT ALL.



The rider that isn't wearing a helmet can prove that they have enough medical insurance to pay for a life long stay in the hospital.



It should be kind of like the seat belt law in that you couldn't get pulled over for it, but they could check you for it, and you could be fined or eventually mc endorsment revoked if you didn't have the proof on you when you road with out.



At the same time private insurance companies could jack up the rates or opt not to cover riders that don't wear lids. I can hear some of you saying "Oh, unfair!" but suck it up. Smokers don't get as good of rates as non smokers, so why should helmetless riders get the same rates as ones wearing lids?



webdev511 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2003, 07:07 AM   #15
longride
Super Duper Mod Man

 
longride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Anywhere they let me
Posts: 10,479
Default Re: All fine and nice, IF...

So, in effect, if there is proof that riding a motorcycle, even with a helmet, is more dangerous than riding in a car (and there is plenty of proof) then ALL motorcyclists should bear the same burden of proof you stated above, as well as "jacking" their rates for participating in this dangerous activity. Why should motorcyclists riding unsafe machines get the same rates as riding in a safe car? By extension, you are condemning yourself with your "burden of proof" argument.
__________________
I'm a knucklehead
longride is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2003, 07:09 AM   #16
longride
Super Duper Mod Man

 
longride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Anywhere they let me
Posts: 10,479
Default Re: PA Helmet Law Changing

"However, I myself wear a helmet 99.9%"



First, 99% isn't good enough because helmet laws require 100% compliance. Second, what if you got hurt the 1% of the time you didn't wear it? How is your windmill tilted now?
__________________
I'm a knucklehead
longride is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2003, 07:38 AM   #17
tumbler
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 289
Default Re: Helmet Laws Bite!

The bill didn't say you can ride a motorcycle, it said that certain people need to wear helmets when riding. Kind of like how we have to wear seat belts during take off and landing, listen to the same speech at the beginning of every flight.

Go visit a grand father in a hospital, with his head stitched up like a baseball, who can't remember who are, because he fell off a old honda 175 at less than 25mph when a car driver wasn't paying attention.

Then watch that same grandfather get dimensa years later and slowly deteriorate due to scar tissue on his brain causing strokes. And watch you grandmother spend 10+ years taking care of her vegetable husband, which was a 24/7 job. Watch them have to sell their Florida retirement home and RV. A long with a very large chunk of their retirement savings to pay medical bills.

tumbler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2003, 07:49 AM   #18
elitegeezer
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 11
Default Re: PA Helmet Law Changing

wonderful point longride. You should be a politician.
elitegeezer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2003, 07:54 AM   #19
tumbler
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 289
Default Re: PA Helmet Law Changing

Why does the government have the right to make us get driver's licenses? I mean this is a free country right? Why can the government make us do anything? Or you can look at it this way: If you loan your car, or anything for that matter, to someone else it is still yours and if you say don't smoke in my car that person has an obligation to not smoke in your car. A gainfully employed person has to pay for the opportunity to work in this country, it's called income tax. The government uses this money for many things, one of which is to build roads. Since they are the government's roads they get to decide how the citizens using them can use them, speed limits, vehicle inspections, seat belt, etc. If you don't like the rules then don't use the road. Ride your bike how ever you want to on your own land.
tumbler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2003, 07:57 AM   #20
ValknMag
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 107
Default Re: Helmet Laws Bite!

"Go visit a grand father in a hospital, with his head stitched up like a baseball, who can't remember who are, because he fell off a ...."

Roof. Ladder. Horse. Pickup truck tailgate. Fence. Ten-foot high stack of government regulations endorsed by people who use emotions to decide what laws the rest of us must put up with. Funny, with all the advocates trying to make my life safe, nobody is endorsing Hahn's devices on horses, but look at Christopher Reeve...
ValknMag is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off