Motorcycle.com

MOKE1K · 09-07-2010, 05:08 PM

I would look towards the safety standards making tracks improve tack width, run off, and changing sections that are to fast giving available property dimensions. Not totally sure but I know around that time they did improved on safety.

MOKE1K · 09-07-2010, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seruzawa

Note that they were about yearly or more until 1984. What changed at that time? I think the suspensions and brakes improved a lot in the mid-80s.

Find out when Eddie Lawson mistakenly discovered the upside down fork and you'll have your answer.
It was definitely after 84 but soon after. I think your correct Seru on your diag!

kleif · 09-15-2010, 11:59 PM

it's dangerous. be careful.

kleif · 09-27-2010, 01:09 AM

it's dangerous . hope luckly.

09-07-2010, 05:08 PM	#21
MOKE1K Registered Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Kalapana, Big Island Posts: 3,956	I would look towards the safety standards making tracks improve tack width, run off, and changing sections that are to fast giving available property dimensions. Not totally sure but I know around that time they did improved on safety. __________________ "YOU CAN'T BOLT ON SKILL" "The only thing limiting your bike, is you" We survived Bush you'll survive Obama! "the most fundamental fact about the ideas of the political left is that they do not work. therefore we should not be surprised to find the left concentrated in institutions where ideas do not have to work in order to survive." --thomas sowell

Sponsored Links	Remove Advertisements
Motorcycle Forum Advertisement

09-15-2010, 11:59 PM	#23
kleif Banned Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: USA Posts: 8	it's dangerous. be careful.

09-27-2010, 01:09 AM	#24
kleif Banned Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: USA Posts: 8	it's dangerous . hope luckly.