|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3
|
Yes OG members its another one of these threads. The one where I tell you i am new to riding and am in need of bike suggestions.
My experience: I started riding with my fiances dad a few months ago and have been using his 750 nighthawk in the parking lot on 4 or 5 occasions for an hour or two each time. Just recently took and passed the MSF course. Size: I am 6'4" with a 34-35" inseam and roughly 200lbs. Current Options being considered: sv650n/s, Ninja 250/650 Question: Ok now the real question. I am a fan of standard and sport bikes and need a bike suitable for my size and experience. Everyone here preaches ninja 250r and I have no opposition to it (if I fit) but my dad and my fiances dad seems to think getting a 250cc is a waste at this point and that I will be bored of it in a short time. I have been looking at sv650's and have pretty much searched through all the craigslist ads and found nothing reasonable. My budget is roughly $3k. So what do I do? Pickup a ninja 250 (after I sit on one) and risk the "getting bored" phenomenon the Dad's speak of or keep searching for a sv650 or perhaps there is another bike you all want to recommend? I am ready to get a bike and start riding, I have all the gear paid for and in my apartment I just need that final piece. Thanks a lot for the help and sorry for the repetitive tall guy/small bike/new guy/what bike thread. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | Remove Advertisements |
|
Motorcycle Forum Advertisement |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Baja 'Bama
Posts: 3,424
|
First, Welcome to the Site!
Now then, a 34+ inseam is going to be a problem. Sport bikes, as a group, will have your heels hitting your back pockets. Standards less so, but still not a lot of room. You might want to look at some of the smaller Dual Purpose bikes, as they have a more relaxed ergo, and for you, somewhere to put your legs. You need to consider how you are going to ride. If you're just going to putz around town, a (relatively) cramped bike will suit you fine. However, if you want to hit the road, comfort will be a BIG issue. Remember that engine size does not necessarily translate to 'usable power.' You can have a lot of fun bopping around on a DP 400cc bike, whereas a 600 I-4 screamer is just uncomfortable, and boggy around town unless you wring the wee out of it. Lastly, a gift: motorcycles and powersports : craigslist eBay kijiji mash : United States Tally-ho!
__________________
You would not understand, this is not how I am... I have become - Comfortably Numb. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 825
|
Try the Ninja 500R, too. Bigger than the little 250, and still a standard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Robby
![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: 8501 ft.
Posts: 16,660
|
You've already been riding a good choice. Pick up a Nighthawk.
__________________
"If you think healthcare is expensive now, just wait until it's free." |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
MODERATOR X
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Next to my still checkin the temp.
Posts: 5,439
|
NO, Don't listen to them! Get a dual-sport with a high saddle position.
Or an old City-X, that had a sky-high seat too. You can always sit on a phone-book like I did with my old Pontiac in the 6th grade...
__________________
A gun is a tool, Marian; no better or no worse than any other tool: an axe, a shovel or anything. A gun is as good or as bad as the man using it. Remember that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 825
|
Yeah, lots worse choices than that Nighthawk 750. And it's within your budget.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3
|
Ended up with a 2001 sv650s with 3900 miles. I paid $2500 and it had been dropped once by the previous owner so the turn signal on the right side is off until I buy a new one. Not too much damage to the plastic though. It runs really smooth and I am happy with it. The power is manageable and I fit pretty well.
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Livin' in a Van: down by the Mariana Trench
Posts: 10,649
|
Looks Great!
Although that generation has "less power", I like them better than the later, "square-tube frame" SVs. Excellent choice, it gets The_AirHawk stamp of approval.
__________________
Parfois, on fait pas semblant Sometimes, it's not pretend Oderint Dum Metuant Let them hate so long as they fear политики предпочитают безоружных крестьян Politicians Prefer Unarmed Peasants Nothing to see here, Citizen. Move along now... |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3
|
Quote:
Thanks I am pumped about it! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SF
Posts: 2,671
|
I second, something about the fluid lines of the round tubes look much better than the stamped look of the later frame. Good choice and looks to be a great deal. Ride safe and enjoy.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|










Thanks I am pumped about it!

