Go Back   Motorcycle Forum > Motorcycle.Com General Discussion > Motorcycle News > Old News > Honda News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-29-2001, 11:05 AM   #141
VFR800-1
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 15
Default Re: Year 2002 VFR Interceptor Dyno Run

Talk about an UNRELENTING ASS !!! "I will never admit they are completely different." How freaking dumb!!! They are as completely different as night and day! I'll bet that this guy doesn't even know what a fuel injected V-FOUR is!!! And not to mention that he is probably too blind to see that there is a single sided swingarm to boot! This guy probably thinks that Aprillia brought the first single sided swingarm to market! This guy is too dumb to know that he should be comparing the zx9pig to the CBR954RR. And probably believes that the RC51 is no different than the ZX9R. Sounds like he would be better off on a Harley with a 300lb bikini wearing doll!
VFR800-1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
Motorcycle Forum
Advertisement
Old 12-29-2001, 11:33 AM   #142
VFR800-1
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 15
Default Re: Year 2002 VFR Interceptor Dyno Run

Madcow's a brit!!! And I don't mean that negatively! Please correct me if I'm wrong...but putting NC30 and madcow together in my book says "British". As a previous owner of an 86 NC30, 83 VFR750, and a 1999 VFR800 the best thing that comes to my mind is the V-FOUR exhaust note!!! I will wait to see if I can live without the Geartrain whine. And the new VFR is supposed to have more induction noise especially when 7000 rpm hits. I'll buy the VFR without them and let you know.
VFR800-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2001, 06:01 PM   #143
vtr_996
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2
Default Re: You can pull from Viffer any time...

C'mon kids, they're both good bikes. The Superhawk for it's all around ability, and the VFR for its couch-like comfort and handling.

You're right though, I definitely wouldn't want my Superhawk when traveling through the middle of nowhere without a gas station in sight. 135 miles and kaput.
vtr_996 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2001, 08:00 PM   #144
polishnightmare
Founding Member
 
polishnightmare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 24
Default Re: Year 2002 VFR Interceptor Dyno Run

True concerning the cost, but that wasn't part of the discussion. It was concerning horse power. All I was saying was yes it has more HP, but it also weighs alot more and the Ducati has better suspension. Also I think the wt facor is important. It is suppose to be a sport/sporttourier. That to me means more on the sport side than touring. There is no reason why this thing should add wieght. As for wt. I am 6'2. Concerning type of bike for me, i currently have a B12. Which is a standard. Yes it wieghs more but it is not a sport touring bike either. Also as far as power mine is putting 78ft/lbs. and 112 Hp to the tire. In addition mine cost 4K less than the VFR and for that I could get suspension up grades, power upgrades,and maybe a turbo. All in all they missed the boat.
polishnightmare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2001, 08:02 PM   #145
polishnightmare
Founding Member
 
polishnightmare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 24
Default Re: Year 2002 VFR Interceptor Dyno Run

missed part of my message. I am 6'2" and wt. 240 lbs.
polishnightmare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2001, 11:50 AM   #146
VFR800-1
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 15
Default Re: It meets 2008 Emissions PEOPLE!

Of course they are available...your local dealer ought to be able to look them up...it would help if you provided the year and country of origin...it looks as if some of the european versions have better graphics.
VFR800-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2001, 03:48 PM   #147
madcow
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 6
Default Re: Year 2002 VFR Interceptor Dyno Run

Nope, Madcow's an Aussie. No offence taken! Speaking of exhaust note I notice that the 360 degree crank models sound a bit like a blender from the exhaust (eg my NC30) but are saved by a great induction roar. And even though I like the exhaust note of the 180 degree VFRs I would have preferred if they were 360 degree 'big-bang' engines too.
madcow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2001, 09:44 PM   #148
brroth
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1
Default Re: Year 2002 VFR Interceptor Dyno Run

Ducati's desmo system is a superior system in that it loses less parasitic horsepower through friction. There is no valve spring pressure to overcome. Have you ever tried to spin a normal valvespring type camshaft in an engine by hand? It requires a fair effort. Also the desmo system eliminates valve float.
brroth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2001, 10:38 PM   #149
HyperBusa
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 50
Default Re: Year 2002 VFR Interceptor Dyno Run

This seems like a worthless datapoint. Go ride the thing on a week long tour, write up an article, and THEN tell us what you think. I'll come back then.
HyperBusa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2001, 11:22 PM   #150
ozman
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2
Default Re: Year 2002 VFR Interceptor Dyno Run

I dunno what sort of dyno test they did on the 2002 VFR in the States,but I'm looking at a Pommie (English) mag. (superbike Jan. 2002) which gives dyno test results as power -101 BHP @ 10,700 rpm and torque -56 ft. lbs. @8600 rpm.

Both these figures are significantly up on my 2001 VFR (about 5%)

Maybe it's some sort of emission control that's buggering up the results in US. Or maybe it's just pommie wishful thinking.
ozman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off