Go Back   Motorcycle Forum > Motorcycle.Com General Discussion > Motorcycle News > Old News > Help!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-09-2001, 01:57 PM   #121
ArtOfTheMotorcycle
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 29
Default Avoiding the need for helmet laws

One of the ironic things about the rhetoric of some anti-helmeters is that it actually increases the likelihood of helmet laws. All that happy horsesh*t about helmets breaking necks, restricting hearing, overheating your brain, turning you into a veggie instead of letting you suffer a quick, clean death, etc., etc. leads some of those less informed souls who believe these logical-sounding-but-wrong axioms to shun helmets in the belief that they are protecting themselves. So fewer people wear them and more people die and--more importantly--suffer devastating, debilitating injuries that could have been avoided with a helmet, and more boor-o-crats and families with dead or disabled loved ones scream for helmet laws. Don't try to talk people who might choose to wear helmets out of doing so; they are helping your cause. The simple, honest argument against helmet laws--"I don't like to wear a helmet, and I don't believe that this is the kind of country where we tell people they must protect themselves"--is the best. But don't spread potentially damaging BS to try to make a false point.
ArtOfTheMotorcycle is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
Motorcycle Forum
Advertisement
Old 02-09-2001, 01:58 PM   #122
CBR1000F
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 367
Default Re: A few words from some prominent people.....

Woooooooo Hoooooooo! Thank you for the quotes. I love them, keep 'em coming.
__________________
People are more violently opposed to fur than leather, because it\'s safer to harass rich women than bikers.
CBR1000F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2001, 02:03 PM   #123
CBR1000F
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 367
Default Re: Nope, can

ROTFLMFAO! I thought the Excursion WAS an armored car!!!
__________________
People are more violently opposed to fur than leather, because it\'s safer to harass rich women than bikers.
CBR1000F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2001, 02:09 PM   #124
CBR1000F
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 367
Default Re: Helmet Law Repeal Stats

LMAO! I'm gonna use that one.
__________________
People are more violently opposed to fur than leather, because it\'s safer to harass rich women than bikers.
CBR1000F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2001, 03:08 PM   #125
griz
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2
Default Re: Helmet Law Repeal Stats

I suppose you dont murder rape and pillage because the law does not allow it......
griz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2001, 03:50 PM   #126
CBR1000F
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 367
Default Re: Why we need helmet laws

Abe Froman, PLEASE reply to this post!
__________________
People are more violently opposed to fur than leather, because it\'s safer to harass rich women than bikers.
CBR1000F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2001, 04:33 PM   #127
Gravestone
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 10
Default Re: An example of "freedom"-from-helmet groups

Even the broken neck argument is bogus. Consider this, Evil Knievel (sp?) broke almost every bone in his body at one time or another and on a couple of occasions, most of them at once. The 2 things never happened, he never broke his neck, he never suffered a skull fracture.
Gravestone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2001, 05:44 PM   #128
huskerdu
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 30
Default Re: Avoiding the need for helmet laws

I'm 100% for use of helmets and 100% against a law to mandate it. That being said I actually got into a discussion once woth a woman who honestly believed helmets did more harm than good. Her evidence was that if your head hit the ground hard with a helmet on the impact would break your neck and she certainly didn't want a broken neck.



When she broke into that line of logic I decided it was time to exit the argument.
huskerdu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2001, 06:26 PM   #129
motorpsyche
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 24
Default Dan, take a swing at this potential situation

Dan, say you had the choice to have your head hit with a bat either while wearing a helmet or not wearing one. Would you really want to obtain data such as: bat speed, the weight of the bat, the material composition of the bat, the dewpoint of the air the bat was travleing through, the time of day the bat was being swung, etc., etc? If you were given the choice, I hope you would immediately say, "I'll choose to wear a helmet!" Getting caught up in statistics when you should be focusing on physics could cost a life here.

motorpsyche is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2001, 06:58 PM   #130
badger
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4
Default Re: Helmet Law Repeal Stats

Am glad to hear that he uses a helmet and I do not care why he is using it. He has found out why you need a helmet and is alive to tell other about it.



I live in Ohio and the helmet law was repealled years ago. I have been riding since 1968 and still use a helmet 100% of the time. In those 32 years ther have been two low speed accidents and my helmets were badly damaged in both accidents, with no injury to me.









badger is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off