Motorcycle.com

Kenneth_Moore · 04-21-2008, 06:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzglyd

Just means that it comes with 6 neutrals.

It's because it's rear-end was slammed.

amejorado · 04-23-2008, 08:48 PM

just a question dont got to be an ass

The_AirHawk · 04-23-2008, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amejorado

just a question dont got to be an ass

Oh! I see you've finally met Longride...........

seruzawa · 04-24-2008, 04:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amejorado

just a question dont got to be an ass

We forgot to throw him his raw meat. Sorry 'bout that.

longride · 04-24-2008, 05:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amejorado

just a question dont got to be an ass

The definition of an ass is a guy that throws 30 grand at a bike and has no idea what he built, or what the result was supposed to be. Did you actually have a clue of what you were supposed to end up with before you started? I think not. Here is a hint. Next time you have your buddies build you a bike, have it dyno'ed BEFORE throwing another 10 grand in the engine and being disappointed with the results. That way you know what the stock horsepower of YOUR BIKE was.

BrowningBAR · 04-24-2008, 05:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amejorado

just a question dont got to be an ass

The Rocker clocked in at 61.42 horses. You can read the comparison of the Rocker, Raider, and Vegas here: http://www.motorcycle.com/shoot-outs...out-69801.html

It has the same engine that you will find in most HDs; Twin Cam 96

Bottom line is, if you are buying a rocker, the point isn't HP. At that is what Longride meant.

BrowningBAR · 04-24-2008, 05:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrowningBAR

The Rocker clocked in at 61.42 horses. You can read the comparison of the Rocker, Raider, and Vegas here: http://www.motorcycle.com/shoot-outs...out-69801.html

It has the same engine that you will find in most HDs; Twin Cam 96

Bottom line is, if you are buying a rocker, the point isn't HP. At that is what Longride meant.

...never mind.

longride · 04-24-2008, 05:27 AM

I think I need some of your Red's Pure Old there Browning. They are coming out of the woodwork!

ClaytScott · 06-02-2008, 08:57 PM

I bought one about 4 weeks ago. I got the Rocker C in the blue. I must say, it is a very nice ride and handles very well. My last bike was a 91' FXRS, this is much lower and much smoother. I totally enjoy it, but it is amazing at how many people tell me that it looks much better in real life.
It goes ok, am already looking into boosting torque and power....quote "Power is increased, too - depending on the model, the Twin Cam 96 produces between 64 bhp and 78 bhp, at 5300 rpm (73 bhp in the Rocker duo)."
[url=http://www.mslmagazine.co.uk/features/mil-music.htm]

04-24-2008, 05:27 AM	#38
longride Super Duper Mod Man Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Anywhere they let me Posts: 10,484	I think I need some of your Red's Pure Old there Browning. They are coming out of the woodwork! __________________ I'm a knucklehead

Sponsored Links	Remove Advertisements
Motorcycle Forum Advertisement

04-23-2008, 08:48 PM	#32
amejorado Registered Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 3	just a question dont got to be an ass

06-02-2008, 08:57 PM	#39
ClaytScott Registered Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Ont. Canada Posts: 1	I bought one about 4 weeks ago. I got the Rocker C in the blue. I must say, it is a very nice ride and handles very well. My last bike was a 91' FXRS, this is much lower and much smoother. I totally enjoy it, but it is amazing at how many people tell me that it looks much better in real life. It goes ok, am already looking into boosting torque and power....quote "Power is increased, too - depending on the model, the Twin Cam 96 produces between 64 bhp and 78 bhp, at 5300 rpm (73 bhp in the Rocker duo)." [url=http://www.mslmagazine.co.uk/features/mil-music.htm]