Motorcycle Forum

Motorcycle Forum (http://www.motorcycle.com/forum/)
-   Harley-Davidson News (http://www.motorcycle.com/forum/harley-davidson-news/)
-   -   Evo v Twin Cam Dyna (http://www.motorcycle.com/forum/harley-davidson-news/4203-evo-v-twin-cam-dyna.html)

The_AirHawk 01-09-2007 09:53 AM

Re: Evo v Twin Cam Dyna
 
!

The_AirHawk 01-09-2007 09:53 AM

Re: Evo v Twin Cam Dyna
 
,

BrowningBAR 01-09-2007 09:55 AM

Re: Evo v Twin Cam Dyna
 
.

BrowningBAR 01-09-2007 09:56 AM

Re: Evo v Twin Cam Dyna
 
:

Dangerousdave_2 01-09-2007 10:01 AM

Re: Evo v Twin Cam Dyna
 
All, right, knock it off. Don't make me come in there!

Fenton 01-09-2007 10:10 AM

Re: Evo v Twin Cam Dyna
 
Period

HelterSkelter 01-09-2007 10:17 AM

Re: Evo v Twin Cam Dyna
 
"can produce more horsepower and torque than the TC 88 for a given cylinder volume."



Let me guess, you own an EVO?



Sorry, Bud but that statement is patently untrue. The TC88 mill was also specifically designed be easily souped up to double its stock power output where as the EVO was not.



The EVO STOCK head does flow better than the TC88 STOCK head, but that doesn't mean anything by it's self.

longride 01-09-2007 10:24 AM

Re: A 10-YEAR LOAN ON A BIKE?!
 
He wants advice on buying a TwinCam or Evo. If he wanted a rolling piece of metric shyt, I'm sure you would be the expert on that subject. Maybe you could tell him the best junkyards to dump it.

billcollins 01-09-2007 10:29 AM

Re: Evo v Twin Cam Dyna
 
We pay VAT on almost everything 'cept food and kids clothes!

Don_Crafts 01-09-2007 11:21 AM

Re: Evo v Twin Cam Dyna
 
One thing to consider:



The '97 Evo, as you said, is sorted out. Everything works great and the aftermarket is massive.



The '02 TC88 was the 4th production year for an engine that is no longer produced. As of '07 the TC88 is gone. The new and improved TC96 is a very different engine.



As for re-sale value, the Evo has done its depreciating. The now obsolete TC88 has just begun to lose its value.





All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:19 AM.