|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#21 |
|
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 512
|
I have a friend that does EPA testing here in Arizona, he say's there is a long framed prototype Buell XB running around the track with a very powerfull water cooled V-Twin that he does not recongize.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | Remove Advertisements |
|
Motorcycle Forum Advertisement |
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 320
|
"The V-Rod motor was designed by Porshe, right?"
Er, no numb-nuts it wasn't. Please try again. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3
|
BUll***** DATA
Hp and Tq = Bull***** 1260 lbs = Bull***** (Duh) |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,490
|
Whether this particular doc is fake or not is besides the point. H-D will come up with a bigger engine. Why? Because 1450cc is not cutting it any more. You have to be pretty ignorant of today´s cruiser market to regard it anything but a middle weighter.
- cruiz-euro |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Registered Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 10
|
Strange that a hoax would find its way to the EPA server. Other "hoax" brands are there as well: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/roadbike/
Also found: 2005 road test results. Here's a load of info on all makes and models: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/cert/veh-cer...estresults.xls |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 131
|
2,450cc! Thats stupid. So is the 2000cc V twin, (Suzuki?) or the 2300cc Triumph. I just do not see any reason for a motorcycle engine to be that large. If people want then, fine but I don't see the point. You can go 190 with 1300cc!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 512
|
Errrr yes Porsche did do a lot of the design work on the V-ROD
|
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|






