Go Back   Motorcycle Forum > Motorcycle.Com General Discussion > Motorcycle News > Old News > Buell News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-25-2004, 04:08 AM   #81
nweaver
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 458
Default Closer to 3000/3500

Closer to 3000/3500 RPM...



And it is better than it sounds, a better way of saying it is ~1/2 the revv range is useable for lazy riding, probably 1/3 for agressive riding.

nweaver is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
Motorcycle Forum
Advertisement
Old 05-25-2004, 04:49 AM   #82
pdad13
Founding Member
 
pdad13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,733
Default Re: ahh the 600rr

Are you kidding? The BBC? I watched a lot of the BBC broadcasts during the major fighting in Iraq. It was like they were reporting a completely different war. I understand differences in interpretation and perspective, but this was ridiculous. I also remember aroundtable discussion show after the major combat had stopped where a very respectected, British military historian (his name escapes me now, but I will remember, I promise) ripped various BBC and other reporters in attendance for their crying wolf over how "things were not going well." I remember him saying that "you people get paid to know better."



It is also well known that the BBC has a very distinct political agenda. Who are you trying to fool?
pdad13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2004, 04:52 AM   #83
pdad13
Founding Member
 
pdad13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,733
Default Re: Closer to 3000/3500

Yes, I agree. For the kind of riding I did, it had more than enough usable power.
pdad13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2004, 08:41 AM   #84
kwh
Founding Member
 
kwh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 58
Default Re: ahh the 600rr

Sorry, missed this. I think the US media does have a very US-centric view of what is happening in the world, just as the BBC has a very UK-centric view. Also, 'middle of the road' in America is far to the right of 'middle of the road' in the UK, so I don't expect the BBC and responsible US news organisations to sing from the same hymn sheet as it were. Most of Europe didn't want to get involved, and a million people marched through London to protest against Britiain joining the US, whereas in the US, Bush was busy conflating 9/11 and Iraq, and claiming that Iraq was about to nuke y'all next week.



Also, during the war, the reporters on the ground were genuinely in a complete information vacuum, and rightly or wrongly were expressing their frustration at not knowing anything, and also trying to judge an entire war based on the little bit they could see; that little town just inside the border with the port in it took a long time to subdue and the port took a lot longer to get up and running than was initially advertised. Also, the Americans managed to kill one ITN crew and then bomb a BBC crew (John Simpson), maiming the sound man. Not that this excuses the reportage that the campaign as a whole was going badly - clearly it wasn't going badly. However, had the Iraqi regular army turned up to fight, it probably would have gone less well than it did, so predicting difficult days ahead was not completely irresponsible.



Where did you perceive bias?
__________________
Ken Haylock
kwh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2005, 10:04 AM   #85
bud101
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4
Default Re: Facts for Fox News Channel (the Bush network) fans.

Why don't you you take your stupid politics to moveon.org or somewhere else that's more appropriate.
bud101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.