|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#41 |
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 328
|
![]() Strangely enough, Eric Buell did an interview last year in the owner's magazine (FUELL), in which he said that he saw no need for liquid cooling, for many years to come.
Mass centralization and light weight are his thing, not BMEP and horsepower per liter. |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links | Remove Advertisements |
Motorcycle Forum Advertisement |
|
![]() |
#42 |
Registered Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 473
|
![]() honestly, what did you EXPECT him to say? "This thing's a dungheap."?
and water cooling aside, don't you think the engine could use such rudimentary features as overhead cams? downdraft carbs? a counterbalancer, mayhaps? some nice leading-edge tech that has been sportbike mainstays for the past, say, 10 friggin years? those things have no bearing on mass centralization. what is "BMEP?" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
Banned
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,752
|
![]() Amen. Excellent sums it up perfectly. Do people expect Buell to say "Hey that sportster engine sucks I would wait to buy one until I convice the Harley bozos who own the company to design a new one"
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,415
|
![]() one thing I've never liked about buell's is the exhaust on them, wouldn't a more conventional system allow them to lower the engine in the frame, I thought mass-centralization was thier whole trip? that rear fender is guarenteed to soak your butt the first time it's even damp out, don'cha think?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,415
|
![]() they should give him a couple of v-rod engines to play with, I bet that engine in a sport bike frame would spank some booty
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1
|
![]() What did you expect him to say.
Put in a light weight water cooled V-twin. Radiator below the seat and then we'd really have something. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
Banned
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,752
|
![]() Yep! You are definiterly right For $10,000 folks are buying an Interceptor, R1, ZX-9R, GSXR1000, 954, and the list goes on. I can see it now $2000 rebates by Christmas. Even then I would probably buy CBR F4i or ZX-6R. Take it down to your price of $7,495 now you are getting some takers.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
Banned
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,752
|
![]() VRod engine too heavy man. Engine like TL1000, SV650, etc.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,415
|
![]() down wit that yo, but suzuki would tell them to ***** up a rope for their engines, at least harley owns the v-rod, and it's got to be lighter than a sporty
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
Founding Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,415
|
![]() trouble is for that 7~8k range you've got 1200 bandits, fz1's, 919's or a z1r, a little more gets you a speed triple or 900 monster, point being the buell would be up against the cream of the nekkid bike crop, and given their somewhat shady reputation, you'd have to be a straight up buell freak to buy one, in which case it don't matter what they cost, 'cause you'd buy it anyway
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
Thread Tools | |
|
|