Go Back   Motorcycle Forum > Motorcycle.Com General Discussion > Motorcycle News > Old News > BMW News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-24-2006, 12:48 PM   #11
LiionsRest
Founding Member
 
LiionsRest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 68
Default Re: BMW Three-wheel Concept

Sorry to say, but in the U.S. this won't sell much. Too big a change from current cars crowding the roads. At the very least, it has to go 75 without straining itself. The best market in the U.S. is commuters looking to save big on fuel $ without feeling like they're in something the other cars will crush if they can't see it or it's too slow.



Rush hour on my road (Rt. 7 in VA near Winchester/Berryville) is pretty cutthroat and fast, with a fairly steep mountain. It has lots of traffic heading to the Washington D.C. area in the morning. If you get in the way, unable to go more than 40-50 up the hill, you'll be made to feel like you're about to be flicked off like some annoying booger. And just wait until a massive 18-wheeler parks it's slab of a chrome bumper a couple of feet behind you... I don't care who you are, that's going to be pretty unnerving.



Whatever other uses besides commuting BMW might envision marketing towards won't generate many sales. Economics has pushed the suburbs farther away from the concentrated areas of employment, making the typical commute a longer highway drive, instead of an intracity hop (where this would be much more suited).



While I applaud anyone trying new designs, and aiming towards fuel efficiency, the practical reality of American driving dictates a more gradual change in this direction.
__________________
Moto Guzzi Breva 1100 (Black, 2006)
LiionsRest is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
Motorcycle Forum
Advertisement
Old 04-24-2006, 01:26 PM   #12
mikenomad
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 361
Default Re: THE PROBLEM WITH THREE-WHEELERS

There are two basic problems with three wheelers:



1. They don't have two wheels.

2. They don't have four wheels.



Two-wheeled vehicles are more fun, and four-wheeled vehicles are more stable.



Leaving off the fourth wheel doesn't save that much weight or expense, and in the case of BMW's three-wheeler and the Carver, there's actually more weight and expense. You could build a lightweight four-wheeled vehicle that got equal fuel mileage.



There's just no advantage to three wheels.
mikenomad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2006, 05:51 AM   #13
rem42
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4
Default Re: BMW Three-wheel Concept

It does seem like the safety benefits are there; there's really something to be said for getting pretty close to a motorcycle and still having something that crumples before you hit the ground. I have to agree with the enviro-wacko-crat comment though- the Prius actually sells because it's a real car that happens to be more environmentally friendly, whereas this fails on most counts to be a motorcycle while being friendly. I also agree with the sentiment about three wheels- my general experience with anything on three wheels is that you *think* it's considerably more stable than it actually is, so you try to have fun on it like it has two but just wind up scaring yourself silly.
rem42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2006, 12:47 PM   #14
Ninjeff
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 16
Default Re: BMW Three-wheel Concept

I think the thing looks like it could be a blast to drive.

I say give it a 100mph top speed, but with wicked quick acceleration, and i'll take a black one.
__________________
\"jesus Walter, this isnt \'Nam....there are RULES\"
Ninjeff is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off