Go Back   Motorcycle Forum > Motorcycle.Com General Discussion > Motorcycle News > Old News > AMA Racing

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-08-2004, 03:57 AM   #1
ZRX_bullock
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 104
Default Re: AMA Superstock Coverage

I sent a message to Two Wheel Tuesday about the lack of Super Stock coverage and how the Daytona Super Stock race peaked my interest.

A problem with Super Stock class is money. The purse for winning the Super Stock race is on par with 12th place in Super Bike.

__________________
ZRX 1200 - Mods make it 130 HP and 85 torque at the rear wheel.
trackday junkie.
ZRX_bullock is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
Motorcycle Forum
Advertisement
Old 04-08-2004, 04:13 AM   #2
Bluethundercat
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2
Default Re: AMA Superstock Coverage

coan someone tell me why Honda isn't entered in the supersport class and Yamaha isn't in superbike?
Bluethundercat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2004, 06:21 AM   #3
captainwhoopass
Founding Member
 
captainwhoopass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,670
Default Re: AMA Superstock Coverage

Honda isn't in Supersport because they are still smarting after having their asses handed to them last year by Yamaha and Kawasaki. Now they're throwing their weight (pun intended) around to have Superstock taken off the air because they're not racing in it and would rather deprive fans of good racing than look bad themselves for not competing with a production bike in a class with all the other manufacturers.



I'm not sure why Yamaha isn't in Superbike, but the reason both them and Kawasaki gave was that the rules changed late in the game and they were unable to develop a bike that is legal to run.

Another reason is that the AMA made up a brilliant rule that prevents factory riders from entering both classes. So, a factory would have to hire a completely separate team to run Superbike than to run Superstock, which would be horrendously expensive, and there also really isn't a talent pool big enough to do this right now in the AMA.
__________________
<blockquote>
\"I knew it. I\'m surrounded by a$$holes.\" [b][i]Lord Helmet, Spaceballs
captainwhoopass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2004, 07:04 AM   #5
Bluethundercat
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2
Default Re: AMA Superstock Coverage

Thanks
Bluethundercat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2004, 09:35 AM   #6
orcyclist
Founding Member
 
orcyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 173
Default Re: AMA Superstock Coverage

It appears that the Formula Extreme and the Superstock coverage will appear on April 13th. Check it out.



At least that's what my TIVO tells me.
__________________
<bold> Rick Busby
deletethisOrcyclist@hotmail.com</bold>
orcyclist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2004, 12:30 PM   #7
rock06r
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 69
Default Let's start a new class

Let's start a new class, you know one that really reflects how people ride out in the real world. Let's call it the "SUPER DUPER EXTREME STOCK BIKE" class. Only harley V-twins, no matter what size or chassis, minus anything that even resembles an exhaust/silencer (louder is better!), leather luggage is mandatory, and riders are only allowed chaps, bikini tops, and sunglasses for safety. I'd watch that.
rock06r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2004, 10:49 PM   #8
Blue_Are1
Founding Member
 
Blue_Are1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 15
Default Re: AMA Superstock Coverage

SPEED is going to be splitting the hour between Superstock and Formula Extreme, showing as many laps of each race as is possible. So at least we will get some coverage of the Superstock class and not just recaps.
Blue_Are1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2004, 06:09 AM   #9
obandoj
Founding Member
 
obandoj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 911
Default Re: AMA Superstock Coverage

Lets face it guys, SPEED is not very interested in having motorcycle racing on the air, and despite what Dave Despain says, they are only filling the gaps on their programing schedule with it.

I personally sent many e-mails to SPEED about their coverage of motorcycle events, only to realise that I had wasted my time, it made no difference at all, sure send all the e-mails you want, it will do no good, they rather have luge racing, go figure.

What we really need, is for a different network to take it over, there are two that come to mind, Spike and the OLN channels, lets write to those channels and maybe we will get a progressive change to take place and improve our plight.
obandoj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2004, 03:29 PM   #10
Flickmeister
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 162
Default Re: AMA Superstock Coverage

It's hard to know where to start when TV coverage and the AMA's thoroughly FUBAR'd rules for this year enter into a discussion. I agree that the Superstock class ought to get full coverage--wasn't that the class that had five riders go across the finish line less than a tenth of a second apart at Daytona? And SPEED, in all of their wisdom will give full coverage to Formula Xtreme--wasn't that the class that has hopped up 600cc bikes on slicks going slower than the 600 Supersport class? Jeeeez.....



The real blame for this insane scenario is how the AMA has so miserably screwed up the classes and rules this year. You'd think after 50 years of racing, they'd get it right. Fat chance. Last year's Formula Xtreme worked pretty well. This year we have 600cc superbike spec bikes that are going slower than the Supersport class. Honda put their factory riders in it because they couldn't compete in the legitimate 600 Supersport class.



In the Superbike class, we have Suzuki, Honda, and Ducati factory efforts, while Kawasaki & Yamaha put their factory riders in the Superstock class. The net result is the racing public gets cheated out of the best factories going head-to-head to determine a championship. This really sucks. While Mat may whine about it, the fact of the matter is that the Superstock bikes perform within a knat's derriere of a Superbike costing tens of thousands more. The future seems to be with the Superstock class in this regard. The 600 Supersport class still offers some of the best racing in the world, no change here except being allowed to run slicks as the Superstock guys do.



As for other classes, maybe bring back the 250cc class (gotta be better than the totally lame Formula Xtreme class). I'd also like to see a 1000cc & 600cc Superstock/Supersport class, on DOT tires, without factory riders to highlight the up and coming young guns. That was the original concept of the 600 & 750cc Supersport classes until the factories jumped in. To me, that sounds like a pretty good line-up. If another class was needed, perhaps a Formula Extreme (somewhat like the original Formula USA class) where it is truly a "run-what-ya-brung" unlimited class, as long as the model is available for sale in this country, that any Pro licensed rider could compete in.



Not that the AMA will listen to us, what do you folks think the class structure for AMA Roadracing should be? Cheers, Jack
Flickmeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off